Are Intravenous Immunoglobulins Effective in Preventing Primary EBV Infection in Pediatric Kidney Transplant
Nicola Bertazza Partigiani1, Veronica Bertozzi1, Maria Sangermano1
1Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua University Hospital, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Insights
Scheduled intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) did not prevent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This EBV prophylaxis strategy may increase susceptibility to viral acquisition in high-risk D+/R- patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Nephrology
- Transplant Immunology
- Virology
Background:
- Primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection poses a high risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) mismatch.
- Current EBV prophylactic strategies lack standardization, necessitating evaluation of novel approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of serial intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration in preventing primary EBV infection in high-risk pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
- To assess the impact of IVIG on promoting long-term EBV-specific immunity.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective case-control study analyzed 26 pediatric kidney transplant recipients (age 1-18) with EBV D+/R- mismatch.
- Fourteen patients received monthly IVIG for six months post-transplant; twelve received no EBV prophylaxis.
- Primary endpoint: cumulative incidence of primary EBV infection; Secondary endpoint: EBNA-IgG seroconversion.
Main Results:
- IVIG prophylaxis was associated with a higher cumulative incidence of EBV infection (64% vs. 25%, p=0.047) and an increased risk of EBV acquisition (HR 3.24, p=0.079).
- EBV-specific immunity, assessed by EBNA-IgG seroconversion, was comparable between groups (HR 1.78, p=0.45), indicating no immunological advantage.
- One patient (7.1%) in the IVIG group developed PTLD, compared to none in the control group.
Conclusions:
- Scheduled IVIG administration does not effectively prevent primary EBV infection or enhance long-term immunity in high-risk EBV D+/R- pediatric kidney recipients.
- IVIG may potentially increase susceptibility to viral acquisition in this population.
- Findings argue against the use of IVIG as EBV prophylaxis in this specific patient group.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients with donor/recipient mismatch (D+/R-) carries the highest risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Current prophylactic strategies are not standardized. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), containing anti-EBV antibodies, have been proposed as a potential preventive option, but evidence is lacking. This single-center retrospective case-control study evaluated the efficacy of serial IVIG administration in preventing primary EBV infection and promoting long-term immunity in this high-risk population. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 26 pediatric kidney transplant recipients (age 1-18 years) with EBV D+/R- mismatch and a median follow-up of 7.5 years. Fourteen patients received scheduled IVIG infusions (200 mg/kg monthly for six months post-transplantation), while twelve received no EBV-directed prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of primary EBV infection, defined as EBV-DNA > 1000 copies/mL in peripheral blood. The secondary endpoint was Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen-Immunoglobulin G (EBNA-IgG) seroconversion. Results: Patients receiving IVIG were significantly younger than controls (median age 4.2 vs. 10.8 years, p = 0.01). No significant variations were observed between groups in renal function or immunosuppressive levels during follow-up. IVIG prophylaxis was unexpectedly linked to a higher cumulative incidence of EBV infection compared with controls (64% vs. 25%, p = 0.047). Time-to-event analysis confirmed an increased, although not statistically significant, risk of EBV acquisition in the IVIG group (Hazard Ratio [HR] 3.24, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.87-12.01; p = 0.079). EBV-specific immunity, assessed by EBNA-IgG seroconversion, was comparable between groups (HR 1.78; p = 0.45), confirming no immunological advantage of IVIG. One IVIG-treated patient (7.1%) developed PTLD, while none did in the control group. Conclusions: Scheduled IVIG administration during the first six months after transplantation does not constitute an effective strategy to prevent primary EBV infection or to enhance long-term immunity in high-risk EBV D+/R- pediatric kidney recipients and may even increase susceptibility to viral acquisition. These findings argue against the use of IVIG as EBV prophylaxis in this population.
More Related Videos
08:52Generation of Multivirus-specific T Cells to Prevent/treat Viral Infections after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Published on: May 27, 2011
10:35Assessment of Antibody-based Drugs Effects on Murine Bone Marrow and Peritoneal Macrophage Activation
Published on: December 26, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
