Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Importance of Secondary Prevention in Coronary Heart Disease
Svetlana Mosteoru1,2, Nilima Rajpal Kundnani2,3, Andreea Rus1
1Ph.D. School Department, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Insights
Cardiovascular risk factors remain poorly controlled in Romanian patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), indicating a need for improved secondary prevention strategies. This study highlights center-level opportunities for better management of modifiable risk factors in CHD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Coronary heart disease (CHD) management requires continuous monitoring of cardiovascular risk factors (RFs).
- Secondary prevention in CHD patients is crucial for reducing morbidity and mortality.
- Assessing RF control in routine outpatient settings provides insights into real-world clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the documentation and control of cardiovascular RFs in patients with established CHD during routine outpatient visits.
- To compare findings with European data from the SURF-CHD registry.
- To identify areas for improvement in secondary prevention at a tertiary care center.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 136 consecutive patients (18-80 years) with coronary artery disease (CAD) was studied.
- Patients had diagnoses of acute coronary syndrome or stable angina pectoris, treated with PCI or CABG.
- Data collection occurred during routine outpatient clinic check-ups from May 2019 to July 2020.
Main Results:
- The study population comprised 81% males with a mean age of 61.7 years; 93.4% underwent PCI.
- Significant proportions of patients had uncontrolled risk factors: 25% current smokers, 50% former smokers, mean BMI 29.9.
- Suboptimal control was noted for dyslipidemia (80.1% no prior history), hypertension (62.5% no prior history), and diabetes (84.6% no prior history).
- Mean LDL cholesterol was 93.55 mg/dL, HbA1c 7.86%, and systolic blood pressure 129 mmHg.
Conclusions:
- Despite established CHD, several modifiable cardiovascular RFs were suboptimally controlled in this single-center audit.
- Findings suggest opportunities for enhancing secondary prevention at the center level.
- The study emphasizes the need for multicenter, nationally representative registries in Romania for broader insights.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: The present study evaluates documentation and control of cardiovascular risk factors (RFs) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) during routine outpatient visits at a single tertiary center in western Romania and places these findings in descriptive context relative to SURF-CHD reports from Europe. Materials and Methods: We have enrolled 136 consecutive patients between 18 and 80 years old with coronary artery disease attending routine outpatient clinic check-ups between May 2019 and July 2020. All patients had been diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome or stable angina pectoris and had been treated either by PCI or CABG. Comparisons with SURF-CHD were primarily descriptive due to non-harmonized denominators and lack of patient-level data; inferential testing was limited to variables with clear n/N in both cohorts. Results: Most patients (81%) were males with a mean age of 61.7 years. 93.4% of the patients had undergone PCI, and 4.4% had coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Regarding risk factors, 25% were current smokers, while 50% were former smokers and the mean BMI value was 29.9 (±6.07). While most patients (80.1%) revealed no previous history of dyslipidemia, 62.5% had no previous history of arterial hypertension, and 84.6% had no previous history of diabetes mellitus. Mean LDL cholesterol levels after a major coronary event remained 93.55 (±43.52) mg/dL, mean HbA1c levels were 7.86 (±1.40)%, while mean systolic blood pressure was 129 (±14.9) mmHg. Conclusions: In this single-center audit, several modifiable RFs remained suboptimally controlled despite established CHD. These results should not be generalized nationally; rather, they highlight center-level opportunities for improving secondary prevention and underscore the need for multicenter, nationally representative registries in Romania.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Preventive Healthcare Services
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Secondary Healthcare System
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

