A clinically relevant reinterpretation of disk approximation testing for inducible AmpC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Arturo Reyes-Gualito1, Luis Raúl Rivera-Garay1, Azyadeh Cobo-Alva1

  • 1Microbiology Laboratory, Clinical Analysis of León, HRAEB Unit, León, Guanajuato, México.

Abstract

Insights

A new interpretation of the disk approximation test improves accuracy in reporting ceftazidime susceptibility for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This method helps prevent errors and supports antimicrobial stewardship.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical microbiology
  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • Diagnostic test development

Background:

  • Current antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods inadequately assess AmpC induction in *Pseudomonas aeruginosa*, leading to errors in ceftazidime reporting.
  • Variability in AmpC induction pathways poses a challenge for accurate susceptibility testing.
  • This study addresses the need for improved methods to detect inducible AmpC production.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a novel interpretation criterion for the disk approximation test to improve ceftazidime susceptibility reporting in *P. aeruginosa*.
  • To evaluate the clinical relevance and diagnostic accuracy of a reinterpreted disk approximation test.
  • To reduce preventable errors in antimicrobial susceptibility reports.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 73 ceftazidime-susceptible *P. aeruginosa* isolates using automated broth microdilution as the reference standard.
  • Compared conventional AmpC inducibility definition (≥5 mm zone flattening) with a novel criterion based on categorical change in ceftazidime susceptibility after imipenem exposure.
  • Utilized ROC curve, comparative, and regression analyses to assess error probability and predictive value.

Main Results:

  • The reference method exhibited a 35.6% overall error probability.
  • The conventional 5 mm cutoff interpretation reduced errors to 5.4% but yielded significant false positives/negatives.
  • The novel criterion, based on categorical change, demonstrated strong predictive value for AmpC inducibility and reduced reporting errors.

Conclusions:

  • Reinterpreting the disk approximation test transforms it into a clinically relevant tool for accurate ceftazidime susceptibility reporting.
  • This readily applicable method in routine laboratories aids in avoiding reporting errors.
  • The findings support enhanced antimicrobial stewardship by providing more reliable susceptibility data.