Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

06:59
Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
11.0K
Increased Aortic Angulation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Still a Challenging Anatomy?
Emre Polat1, Arianna Fortunato1, Lena Schemet2,3
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Augsburg University Hospital, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
|November 27, 2025
Summary
Increased aortic angulation (AA) during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) did not impact device success or safety. However, higher AA correlated with increased fluoroscopy and contrast use in TAVI procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Increased aortic angulation (AA) presents anatomical challenges during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
- The impact of AA on TAVI procedural outcomes requires further evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical and procedural implications of aortic angulation in contemporary TAVI procedures.
- To determine if AA affects device success, safety, and resource utilization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational study of 509 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI.
- Primary endpoint: device success (VARC-3 criteria). Secondary endpoints: technical success, 30-day safety, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, paravalvular regurgitation (PVR), and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI).
- Statistical analysis included multivariable regression, ROC, and spline analyses to evaluate AA's association with outcomes.
Main Results:
- Device success (89.4%), technical success (96.3%), and early safety (75.6%) were achieved.
- Aortic angulation did not significantly affect device success, technical success, or early safety.
- AA correlated with increased fluoroscopy times (P=.006) and contrast usage (P=.037), but not with PVR or PPI.
Conclusions:
- Higher aortic angulation in TAVI increases procedural imaging demands (fluoroscopy and contrast).
- Aortic angulation does not adversely impact device performance or clinical safety outcomes in TAVI.
- Outcomes remained consistent across different prosthesis types, irrespective of aortic angulation.

