Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
Published on: April 19, 2024
Which Risk Score Best Predicts Prolonged Air Leak After Lobectomy? A Comparative Evaluation Study
Yuki Shindo1, Satoshi Fumimoto1, Nobuharu Hanaoka1
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.
Prolonged air leak (PAL) after lung surgery is common. The Epithor score showed the best overall performance in predicting PAL, but combining scores may improve risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Thoracic Surgery
- Pulmonary Medicine
- Surgical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Prolonged air leak (PAL) is a frequent complication after pulmonary resection, leading to increased patient morbidity, longer hospital stays, and higher healthcare costs.
- Existing scoring systems aim to predict PAL, but their clinical validation and comparative performance require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive performance of three established scoring systems—the Epithor score, Gilbert score, and prolonged air leak score (PALS)—for PAL in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.
- To identify independent predictors of PAL within this specific surgical cohort.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 534 patients who underwent VATS single-lobe lobectomy for primary lung cancer between 2012 and 2021.
- PAL was defined as an air leak persisting for more than 5 days postoperatively.
- Model performance was evaluated using discrimination metrics (AUC, calibration plots, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Brier score) and clinical utility assessed via decision curve analysis (DCA).
Main Results:
- The incidence of PAL was 9.9% (53 patients). Independent risk factors identified included male sex, body mass index <25.5 kg/m², and the presence of pleural adhesions.
- The Epithor score demonstrated the highest discrimination (AUC = 0.735), while PALS showed the most accurate calibration.
- Decision curve analysis indicated that Epithor offered the greatest net benefit at low probability thresholds, Gilbert at mid-range thresholds, and PALS across typical clinical ranges.
Conclusions:
- In this single-center cohort, the Epithor score exhibited the best overall predictive performance for PAL following VATS lobectomy.
- PALS provided superior threshold-specific calibration and clinical utility.
- Combining the Epithor and PALS may enhance individualized risk stratification for PAL, though definitive superiority of any single model was not established.
More Related Videos
08:46A Standardized Method for Measuring Internal Lung Surface Area via Mouse Pneumonectomy and Prosthesis Implantation
Published on: July 26, 2017
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pneumothorax-II
Clinical Manifestations:
Relative Risk