Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Profiling Sensitivity to Targeted Therapies in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patient-Derived Organoids
Published on: November 22, 2021
Savolitinib Plus Osimertinib in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated, MET-Amplified Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung
James Chih-Hsin Yang1, Yuh-Min Chen2, Ullas Batra3
1Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Cancer Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background:
MET amplification is the most common resistance mechanism to first-line osimertinib. We report safety and efficacy data from a phase II study assessing savolitinib plus osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated, MET-amplified, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Patients And Methods:
Patients with EGFR-mutated, MET-amplified (MET gene copy number ≥ 5 or MET:CEP7 ratio ≥ 2), advanced NSCLC post-osimertinib were enrolled. Patients received savolitinib 300 mg once daily (QD) plus osimertinib 80 mg QD or savolitinib plus placebo. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Exploratory analysis included retrospective efficacy assessment by higher MET cutoffs (immunohistochemistry 3+ staining ≥ 90% tumor cells and / or MET gene copy number ≥ 10).
Results:
Thirty patients were randomized (14 savolitinib-osimertinib; 16 savolitinib-placebo). Among all patients, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 57% (29-82) versus 13% (2-38); median PFS (95% CI) was 7.4 months (5.6-not calculable [NC]) versus 1.6 months (1.3-4.1) for savolitinib-osimertinib and savolitinib-placebo, respectively. In patients with higher MET cutoffs, ORR was 63% (24-91) and 29% (4-71); median PFS was 8.2 months (4.1-NC) and 4.0 months (1.3-NC) for savolitinib-osimertinib (n = 8) and savolitinib-placebo (n = 7), respectively. There were no new safety signals. This study was terminated early and the contribution of osimertinib to savolitinib is being assessed further in SAVANNAH (NCT03778229) in patients with higher MET biomarker cutoffs.
Conclusions:
Savolitinib plus osimertinib demonstrated numerically higher clinical activity versus savolitinib plus placebo in all patients and patients with higher MET biomarker cutoffs.
Insights
Savolitinib combined with osimertinib shows improved outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET amplification. This combination therapy offers higher response rates and longer progression-free survival in NSCLC patients resistant to initial treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Research
- Pharmacology
Background:
- MET amplification is a primary resistance mechanism to first-line osimertinib treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Understanding resistance mechanisms is crucial for developing effective therapies for advanced NSCLC.
- Targeted therapies are essential for managing specific genetic alterations in cancer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of savolitinib plus osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutated, MET-amplified advanced NSCLC.
- To assess the impact of combining a MET inhibitor (savolitinib) with an EGFR inhibitor (osimertinib) in a resistant NSCLC population.
- To explore the efficacy of this combination in patients with higher MET amplification cutoffs.
Main Methods:
- A phase II study enrolled patients with EGFR-mutated, MET-amplified advanced NSCLC who progressed on osimertinib.
- Patients received either savolitinib plus osimertinib or savolitinib plus placebo.
- Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.
Main Results:
- The savolitinib-osimertinib combination showed a 57% ORR versus 13% for savolitinib-placebo across all patients.
- Median PFS was 7.4 months with savolitinib-osimertinib compared to 1.6 months with savolitinib-placebo.
- In patients with higher MET cutoffs, ORR was 63% for the combination arm and median PFS was 8.2 months.
Conclusions:
- Savolitinib plus osimertinib demonstrated superior clinical activity compared to savolitinib plus placebo.
- The combination therapy showed promising results in patients with MET-amplified NSCLC, including those with higher MET expression.
- Further investigation in the SAVANNAH trial (NCT03778229) is ongoing for higher MET biomarker cutoffs.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...