Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

08:06
Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy
Published on: January 31, 2025
638
Intersectionality in surgical care in LMICs: A systematic scoping review
Ayla Gerk1, Shreenik Kundu1, Elena Guadagno2
1McGill University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Harvey E. Beardmore Division of Pediatric Surgery, The Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
American Journal of Surgery
|November 27, 2025
Summary
Intersectionality in surgical care in low and middle-income countries reveals how overlapping social identities impact access and outcomes. Understanding these intersections is key to addressing health inequities and improving surgical services.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Surgical Care Equity
- Social Determinants of Health
Background:
- Intersectionality analyzes how overlapping social identities interact with power structures to create inequality.
- In low and middle-income countries (LMICs), this lens can reveal cumulative disadvantages in surgical care.
- Understanding these intersections is crucial for addressing health disparities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the application of intersectionality in surgical care within LMICs.
- To identify how intersecting social dimensions affect surgical access and outcomes.
- To uncover cumulative disadvantages and inequities in LMIC surgical systems.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across eight databases.
- Studies investigating the intersection of at least two marginalized social dimensions and surgical care in LMICs were identified.
- 31 studies were included from an initial 7325 abstracts.
Main Results:
- No studies explicitly used the term 'intersectionality,' but an average of 4.3 social determinants were analyzed per study.
- The most frequently studied determinants were income (100%), location (87.1%), gender/sex (77.4%), and education (77.4%).
- Beliefs (54.8%) and other factors like insurance, occupation, race/ethnicity, language, and caste were less frequently reported.
Conclusions:
- Applying an intersectional lens is supported by the findings to understand social determinant interactions.
- This approach helps identify the most vulnerable populations within surgical care systems.
- Findings can inform targeted policies to address gaps in surgical care access in LMICs.

