Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Noninvasive, In-pen Approach Test for Laboratory-housed Pigs
Published on: June 5, 2019
Visually estimating body mass of wild pigs
Nathan P Snow1, Kelly J Koriakin2, Michael J Lavelle2
1United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA. nathan.p.snow@usda.gov.
Estimating wild pig body mass visually can be inaccurate for younger, heavier animals. Accurate visual estimation requires considering age indicators to inform wild pig management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Wildlife Ecology and Management
- Invasive Species Biology
- Animal Physiology and Biometrics
Background:
- Wild pig (Sus scrofa) body mass is crucial for assessing population health, reproductive capacity, and resilience of this invasive species.
- Accurate body mass data is vital for effective management, but traditional weighing methods are often impractical in the field.
- Visual estimation of wild pig body mass is a potential alternative, but its accuracy and influencing factors require investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of visual body mass estimation in wild pigs.
- To identify demographic and morphometric factors influencing the accuracy of visual mass estimates.
- To provide recommendations for improving visual body mass estimation in wild pigs for management purposes.
Main Methods:
- Visual body mass estimates were collected for 1,210 wild pigs across five regions (Alabama, Texas, Hawaii, Guam, Queensland).
- Actual weights were recorded, alongside morphometric measurements and age data for each animal.
- Statistical analysis was performed to determine the correlation between estimated and actual weights, and the influence of age and morphometrics.
Main Results:
- Overall, visual estimates were highly accurate, with an average underestimation of only -0.14 kg.
- Estimates were significantly underestimated for younger wild pigs (<1-3 years) that were heavier (>30 kg), with errors up to -20 kg.
- Wild pigs continued to grow in length, height, and girth with age, impacting visual estimation accuracy, particularly for stout, younger individuals.
Conclusions:
- Visual body mass estimation can be a reliable tool for wild pigs, but age-related morphological differences must be considered.
- Underestimation of younger, heavier wild pigs can misinform crucial population management decisions regarding reproductive capacity.
- Regular observer calibration and incorporating age indicators (e.g., morphological proportions) are recommended for accurate visual mass estimation.
More Related Videos
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
02:47Author Spotlight: Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System
Published on: May 12, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Mass and Weight
Apparent Weight
Consider a person standing on a bathroom scale inside an elevator. If the scale is accurate at rest, its reading equals the...
Mass and Weight