Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
Published on: October 24, 2025
Machine learning and process-based modeling of spatiotemporal changes in active layer thickness across Alaska
Sagar Gautam1, Umakant Mishra2, Sarah N Scott3
1Bioscience Division, Sandia National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA. sgautam@sandia.gov.
Permafrost degradation in Alaska is accelerating, increasing active layer thickness (ALT). Machine learning models show smaller future ALT increases than traditional methods, crucial for Arctic adaptation strategies.
Area of Science:
- Earth and Environmental Sciences
- Climate Science
- Geophysics
Background:
- Permafrost degradation in the Arctic poses significant risks to infrastructure and ecosystems due to accelerating warming.
- Active Layer Thickness (ALT) is a critical indicator of permafrost thaw and its associated impacts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the spatiotemporal dynamics of ALT across Alaska under projected climate change scenarios.
- To compare the performance of a physically based model (Stefan) with machine learning (ML) techniques for ALT prediction.
- To assess the sensitivity of ALT to future weather conditions using Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) projections.
Main Methods:
- Integrated field observations, environmental datasets, the Stefan model, and random forest (RF) ML techniques.
- Utilized CMIP6 weather projections under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP 2-4.5 and SSP 5-8.5) for future climate scenarios.
- Analyzed variable importance (mean annual temperature, slope angle, sediment transport index, stream power index) for ALT prediction.
Main Results:
- The RF model showed better performance on training data (R² = 0.84) but lower generalizability on test data (R² = 0.24) compared to the Stefan model (R² = 0.53 training, R² = 0.54 testing).
- Mean annual temperature and slope angle were the most significant predictors of ALT.
- Projected ALT increases by 2100 are 3.3 cm (SSP 2-4.5) and 5.9 cm (SSP 5-8.5) for the ML model, versus 13 cm (SSP 2-4.5) and 28 cm (SSP 5-8.5) for the Stefan model, with greatest increases in northern Alaska.
Conclusions:
- Hybrid modeling approaches combining physical and ML techniques offer valuable insights into complex ALT dynamics.
- ML models suggest more conservative ALT increases compared to the Stefan model, highlighting the importance of model selection for Arctic adaptation.
- Accelerated permafrost thaw necessitates improved predictive capabilities to mitigate risks to Arctic infrastructure, ecosystems, and carbon release.
More Related Videos
09:19Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging
Published on: April 18, 2025
09:06Removal of Exogenous Materials from the Outer Portion of Frozen Cores to Investigate the Ancient Biological Communities Harbored Inside
Published on: July 3, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation Processes
Thematic Layering in GIS
Global Climate Change
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Boundary Layer Characteristics
Precipitation Gravimetry
In determining nickel by gravimetric analysis, a precipitant of ethanolic dimethylglyoxime is added to a hot nickel salt solution. This is quickly followed by the dropwise addition of dilute ammonia solution until precipitation occurs. A...