Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Effect of carperitide on clinical outcomes among patients with acute heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized and
Tsuyoshi Shiga1, Atsushi Suzuki2, Sachie Inoue3,4
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan. shiga@jikei.ac.jp.
Insights
This meta-analysis found that carperitide treatment for acute heart failure (AHF) did not significantly reduce in-hospital mortality in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Overall, carperitide showed no superiority over non-carperitide treatments for AHF outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Carperitide, an α-human A-type natriuretic peptide, is used for acute heart failure (AHF) treatment, primarily in Japan.
- Its clinical effectiveness in AHF patients remains to be established.
- This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate carperitide's impact on AHF clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical effectiveness of carperitide in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).
- To evaluate the effect of carperitide on in-hospital mortality and other clinical outcomes in AHF patients.
Main Methods:
- Searched MEDLINE, ICHUSHI, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score matching (PSM) studies.
- Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes: long-term mortality, HF rehospitalization, length of hospital stay, and hypotension.
- Calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs)/mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random effects model.
Main Results:
- Nine studies (4 RCTs, 5 PSM) were included.
- Combined RCTs and PSM studies showed higher in-hospital mortality with carperitide (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.07-1.78).
- RCTs alone found no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (OR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.07-10.49); no differences in other outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Carperitide therapy may not be superior to non-carperitide therapy for reducing in-hospital mortality in AHF.
- Carperitide did not demonstrate improved long-term outcomes compared to non-carperitide treatments.
- Further research may be needed to clarify carperitide's role in AHF management.
Background:
Carperitide, which is an α-human A-type natriuretic peptide, is used intravenously for the treatment of acute heart failure (AHF) primarily in Japan. However, its clinical effectiveness has not been established. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effect of carperitide on the clinical outcomes of patients with AHF.
Methods:
We searched the MEDLINE, ICHUSHI, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases using a defined search strategy to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score matching (PSM) studies. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were long-term mortality, HF rehospitalization, length of hospital stay and hypotension. Pooled odds ratios (ORs)/mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using the random effects model.
Results:
A total of nine studies were evaluated in the meta-analysis, including four RCTs and five PSM studies. A meta-analysis of RCTs and PSM studies revealed that the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the carperitide group than in the noncarperitide group (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.07-1.78; I2 = 77%). However, a meta-analysis of the RCTs alone revealed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (OR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.07-10.49; I2 = 39%). There were no significant differences observed between the two groups in terms of long-term mortality, HF rehospitalization, incidence of hypotension, or length of hospital stay.
Conclusions:
This meta-analysis suggested that carperitide therapy may not be superior to noncarperitide therapy in terms of reducing in-hospital mortality rates or improving long-term outcomes in patients with AHF.
Trial Registration:
The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251071777).
More Related Videos
10:05Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies