Wildlife risk mitigation protocols reduce risk species visits and pathogen marker detection in open-air farms

  • 0SaBio Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC) CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Wildlife risk mitigation protocols (RMPs) reduced high-risk wildlife visits by 30% and pathogen marker detection by 18% on outdoor farms. These findings highlight RMPs

Area Of Science

  • Veterinary Public Health
  • Wildlife Ecology
  • Environmental Microbiology

Background

  • Outdoor farming systems balance biodiversity benefits with increased disease risk at the wildlife-livestock interface.
  • Wildlife risk mitigation protocols (RMPs) are proposed for disease control, but their effectiveness requires further assessment.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To quantify the impact of farm-specific RMPs on wildlife detection and pathogen marker prevalence.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of RMPs in reducing disease transmission risks in outdoor farming.

Main Methods

  • Revisited 14 farms from a pilot study to assess RMP implementation.
  • Utilized camera traps (CTs) for wildlife detection and environmental nucleic acid detection (ENAD) with sponges for pathogen markers.

Main Results

  • RMP application led to a 30% reduction in high-risk wildlife farm visits and an 18% decrease in pathogen marker detection frequency.
  • Significant reduction in Salmonella spp. (invA marker) detection frequency, correlating with decreased wild boar detection.
  • Varied effects observed across farms, with some small ruminant farms showing increased detection of certain species/markers.

Conclusions

  • Farm-specific RMPs demonstrate effectiveness in mitigating wildlife presence and pathogen detection in outdoor farming systems.
  • Noninvasive monitoring methods (CTs and ENAD) are valuable tools for assessing interventions at the wildlife-livestock interface.
  • Findings support the broader application of RMPs and monitoring techniques across diverse farming systems and pathogens.

Related Concept Videos

Threats to Biodiversity 01:50

26.5K

There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...

Conservation of Declining Populations 02:07

12.5K

Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.

Conservation efforts often utilize scientific approaches to identify the reasons, or the agents, causing the population to decline. This approach then devises steps to remove, oppose, or neutralize the agents.

Conservation efforts may also introduce a test group to determine the probable cause of the decline. The...

Defenses Against Pathogens and Herbivores 02:26

29.4K

Plants present a rich source of nutrients for many organisms, making it a target for herbivores and infectious agents. Plants, though lacking a proper immune system, have developed an array of constitutive and inducible defenses to fend off these attacks.

Mechanical defenses form the first line of defense in plants. The thick barrier formed by the bark protects plants from herbivores. Hard shells, modified branches like thorns, and modified leaves like spines can also discourage herbivores...