A phase 1/2 study of DS-1594 menin inhibitor in relapsed/refractory acute leukemias

Jayastu Senapati1, Marina Konopleva1,2, Ghayas C Issa1

  • 1Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 77030, Houston, TX, USA.

PubMed

Insights

This Phase 1 trial of DS-1594b, a menin inhibitor for relapsed/refractory leukemias, was stopped early due to lack of efficacy. While generally safe, DS-1594b did not demonstrate significant clinical activity in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pharmacology

Background:

  • Menin inhibitors are emerging therapies for menin-dependent leukemias.
  • Preclinical data for menin inhibitors show variable efficacy.
  • DS-1594b is an investigational menin inhibitor.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of DS-1594b.
  • To establish a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for DS-1594b in patients with relapsed/refractory leukemias.
  • To assess the preliminary efficacy of DS-1594b.

Main Methods:

  • Phase 1/2, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation study.
  • Adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) were enrolled.
  • Pharmacokinetic analysis and safety assessments were performed.

Main Results:

  • The trial was stopped at Phase 1 due to lack of efficacy and portfolio decisions; no RP2D was established.
  • Differentiation syndrome (DS) occurred in 29% of patients, with dose-limiting toxicities observed.
  • No complete or partial responses were achieved; 23% of patients showed >25% bone marrow blast reduction.
  • DS-1594b exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and appeared safe with a lead-in dosing strategy.

Conclusions:

  • DS-1594b demonstrated limited efficacy at the tested doses in patients with relapsed/refractory leukemias.
  • The drug was generally safe, with differentiation syndrome being a key toxicity.
  • A lead-in dosing approach may improve tolerability, but overall efficacy remains a concern.