Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: January 29, 2016
Feasibility and preliminary functional, physical, and psychosocial effects of high-intensity functional training for
Lyndsie M Koon1, Joseph E Donnelly2, Richard Washburn2
1Research, Training Center on Independent Living, Life Span Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. lyndsiek@ku.edu.
Purpose:
This study evaluated the feasibility and initial health effects on functional, physical, and psychosocial outcomes of a community-based, 12-week high-intensity functional training (HIFT) intervention for adults with mobility disabilities.
Design And Sample:
A single-group, pre-post design with assessments at baseline and post-intervention. Twelve participants (75% female; 37-74 years) with mobility disabilities.
Intervention:
Twelve-week, thrice-weekly community-based HIFT program.
Measures:
Feasibility was assessed via recruitment, retention, and adherence. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) evaluated self-report physical function, while physical health outcomes comprised fitness, strength, flexibility, and weight-related assessments. Psychosocial measures included quality of life (QOL), self-efficacy, and perceived barriers. Energy expenditure via portable indirect calorimetry and exit interviews captured participant experiences.
Analysis:
Feasibility was reported as percentages; descriptive statistics and effect sizes were calculated for functional, physical, and psychosocial outcomes. Thematic analysis identified themes from transcriptions.
Results:
Recruitment was 51%, retention was 83%, and attendance was 77.5%, with one adverse event. Cohen's d effect sizes indicated improvements in function (d = 0.93-1.04), fitness (d = 0.65-1.59), flexibility (d = 0.36-0.64), BMI (d = 0.32), QOL (d = 1.04), self-efficacy (d = 1.03), and barriers to health behavior (d = 0.48). Participants reported high satisfaction and community support following the intervention. Energy expenditure averaged 154.65 (65.5) kcals/session and 86.13 (42) kcals during exercise.
Conclusion:
A community-based HIFT program for individuals with mobility disabilities is feasible; however, the small sample size limits the ability to attribute changes to the intervention.
Clinicaltrials:
GOV: HIFT for People with Mobility-Related Disabilities (Research GO); NCT05516030.
More Related Videos
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
07:31A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020