Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
[Intravenous thrombolysis managed by a stroke team. Its feasibility]
Marcelo Chaves1, Ailen Brett1, Luz Martinez2
1Servicio de Neurología, Hospital San Martín, Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina.
Implementing intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for ischemic stroke in general emergency rooms is feasible. This approach, utilizing a multidisciplinary team, shows effectiveness and acceptable safety, improving access to crucial stroke treatment.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Ischemic stroke is a major cause of adult death and disability.
- Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is effective but underutilized in Argentina, particularly outside specialized Stroke Units.
- Limited access to IVT hinders optimal patient outcomes in resource-constrained settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility of implementing IVT for ischemic stroke patients in a general emergency room setting.
- To evaluate utilization, effectiveness, and safety indicators of IVT administered by a multidisciplinary team.
- To determine if IVT can be safely and effectively provided outside of traditional Stroke Units.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational study of 1215 ischemic stroke patients (September 2017 - July 2024).
- Comparison of clinical characteristics, door-to-needle times, neurological outcomes (NIHSS score improvement), and complications (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality) between IVT-treated and untreated patients.
- Analysis focused on patients treated in a general emergency room by a multidisciplinary team.
Main Results:
- 12% (n=143) of patients received IVT, with a median door-to-needle time of 75 minutes (38% treated <60 minutes).
- IVT significantly improved neurological outcomes (43% vs. 14%; OR 5.5; p<0.001) but increased symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage risk (8.4% vs. 0.2%; OR 21.8; p<0.001).
- In-hospital mortality showed no significant difference between groups (14% vs. 9.0%; OR 0.8; p=0.6).
Conclusions:
- Implementing IVT in general emergency rooms by specialized teams is feasible and achieves quality indicators comparable to specialized centers.
- This model can enhance access to effective stroke treatments in settings with limited resources.
- The study demonstrates a viable organizational strategy for improving ischemic stroke care.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management

