Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Unsupervised Coverage Sampling to Enhance Clinical Chart Review Coverage for Computable Phenotype Development:
Zigui Wang1, Jillian H Hurst2, Chuan Hong1
1Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Road, 9023 Hock Plaza, Durham, NC, 27705, United States, +1 919-691-5011.
This study introduces coverage sampling to improve computable phenotype (CP) development from electronic health records (EHR). This method enhances patient cohort diversity and CP performance compared to random sampling.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Machine Learning
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Developing computable phenotypes (CPs) from electronic health records (EHR) relies on clinician chart review for gold-standard labels.
- Random sampling of patient charts may not capture population diversity, leading to biased and poorly performing CPs, especially for smaller subpopulations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose an unsupervised coverage sampling approach for EHR data.
- To enhance patient cohort diversity and improve information coverage in chart review samples for better CP development.
Main Methods:
- Implemented an unsupervised coverage sampling method involving patient population clustering and stratified sampling.
- Introduced a nearest neighbor distance metric to evaluate sample coverage.
- Compared coverage sampling against random sampling via simulation studies and a real-world COVID-19 hospitalization CP development.
Main Results:
- Coverage sampling demonstrated broader patient population coverage than random sampling in simulations.
- When subpopulations exist, coverage sampling improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) by approximately 0.03-0.05.
- In a real-world COVID-19 application, coverage sampling yielded a more representative sample and a 0.02 AUC improvement over random sampling.
Conclusions:
- The proposed coverage sampling method is easy to implement and generates more representative chart review samples.
- This leads to CPs with improved performance for both subpopulations and the overall cohort.
- Alternative sampling strategies beyond random selection should be considered for CP development.
Related Concept Videos
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Kaplan-Meier Approach

