Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve quantification with single photon emission computed
Barnabás Baksa1, Sreeyapureddy Surendranath Reddy2, Sára Bundula3
1Medical Imaging Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. baksa.barnabas@semmelweis.hu.
Background:
Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), derived from dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), offers quantitative insight into coronary physiology and may overcome limitations of conventional semi-quantitative SPECT. We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of SPECT-derived MFR in comparison with invasive coronary angiography (ICA), PET-MPI, and long-term patient outcomes.
Results:
A comprehensive literature search was done in scientific databases for studies comparing SPECT-derived MFR in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease to ICA, PET-MPI, or ≥ 12-month follow-up for major adverse cardiac events. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models for studies comparing SPECT-MFR with PET-MPI, and reporting diagnostic performance metrics including sensitivity and specificity. Thirty-two studies were included (n = 19 for ICA; n = 8 for PET-MPI; 1 for both ICA and PET-MPI and n = 4 for follow-up). Thirty studies showed a significant correlation between SPECT-derived MFR and reference standards with excellent area under the curve values (AUC > 0.7) reported. Six PET-MPI comparator studies (with a total number of participants, n = 180) were included in the meta-analysis, yielding a pooled sensitivity of 78.5% (95% CI: 71.7-84.1%) and specificity of 89.3% (95% CI: 70.4-96.7%) (diagnostic odds ratio = 15.7 (95% CI: 6.270-39.269)). MFR consistently predicted major adverse cardiac events in prognostic studies, independent of obstructive coronary status.
Conclusions:
Quantitative MFR derived from dynamic SPECT-MPI correlates well with established diagnostic reference tests and independently predicts adverse outcomes. While PET remains the reference standard, SPECT-MPI offers a viable and more accessible alternative. Standardised protocols and large-scale prospective validation are needed to optimise its clinical implementation.
Prospero Registration:
CRD42024507703.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
Published on: August 25, 2023
06:39Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015