Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Standards of Care I

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

Product specifications define the acceptable quality of a pharmaceutical product by ensuring identity, purity, potency, and strength. These specifications serve as benchmarks during development, manufacturing, and post-approval quality control. Clinically relevant specifications are particularly important because they directly relate to a drug's safety and efficacy in clinical use.Dissolution studies are critical biopharmaceutic tools that link in vitro behavior to in vivo performance. They...

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A qualitative human factors investigation of the impact of intraoperative CT-based navigation on interprofessional work in the operating theatre.

Surgery open science·2026

Same author

Standardized low-flow ventilation with PEEP maintenance during bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a pilot trial.

Journal of intensive care·2026

Same author

CartoPhaRe: a nation-wide survey of clinical pharmacy activities in French Critical Care Units.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same author

Losmapimod, an Oral Anti-p38 MAP Kinase, Demonstrates Anti-Neuropathic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Rat Acute Pain.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026

Same author

Corrigenda: Pain, Agitation, Delirium, and Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome Management in Children Who Are Critically Ill: Protocol for a European Clinical Practice Guideline Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach.

JMIR research protocols·2026

Same author

Survey on relationship between microbiological laboratories and ICUs in France.

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease·2026

Same journal

Prevention and diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia, what you should know, what is debated and what should come next.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

Impact of patient positioning on the occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events in children -a cluster randomised trial - the POSSUM trial.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

Infraclavicular subclavian vein catheterisation: a randomised controlled trial comparing standard ultrasound guidance and a new needle guidance device.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

Mobile versus in-center ECMO initiation in pediatric patients: a comparative outcome study.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

Guidelines: Diagnosis and management of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions 2025.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

Same journal

The vital role of distal end location of endotracheal tubes in human trachea.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

Guidelines on Preventing Medication Errors in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.

Alexandre Theissen¹, Remy Collomp², Charles-Hervé Vacheron³

¹Department of Anaesthesia, Clinique Saint François, Vivalto group, Nice, France; French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR : Société Française d'Anesthésie Réanimation).

Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine

|November 28, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

French experts developed 29 practice guidelines to prevent medication errors in anesthesia and intensive care, achieving strong consensus. These recommendations aim to improve patient safety in critical care settings.

Keywords:

Anaesthesia Intensive care Medication errors Prevention

More Related Videos

Synovial Fluid Analysis to Identify Osteoarthritis

Synovial Fluid Analysis to Identify Osteoarthritis

Published on: October 20, 2022

A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction

A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction

Published on: April 5, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

Synovial Fluid Analysis to Identify Osteoarthritis

Synovial Fluid Analysis to Identify Osteoarthritis

Published on: October 20, 2022

A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction

A Blood-based Test for the Detection of ROS1 and RET Fusion Transcripts from Circulating Ribonucleic Acid Using Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction

Published on: April 5, 2018

Area of Science:

Anesthesiology
Clinical Pharmacy
Patient Safety

Background:

Medication errors pose a significant risk in anesthesia and intensive care.
Professional societies recognize the need for standardized guidelines to mitigate these errors.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop evidence-based professional practice guidelines for preventing medication errors.
To provide actionable recommendations for healthcare professionals in anesthesia and intensive care.

Main Methods:

A panel of 19 experts from SFAR and SFPC convened.
The GRADE methodology was employed to assess evidence quality.
Recommendations were formulated across four key domains: work environment, human factors, risk management, and drug shortages.

Main Results:

29 distinct recommendations were established through expert consensus.
The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method guided the evidence assessment.
A strong agreement was achieved on all formulated recommendations.

Conclusions:

Experts reached a strong consensus on the proposed recommendations.
The guidelines aim to enhance the prevention of medication errors in critical care environments.