Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

238
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
238
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

164
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
164
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

465
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
465
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.2K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of treatments for postpartum depression on breastfeeding practices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Midwifery·2026
Same author

Equity of financial protection for health care in high-income countries: A systematic scoping review.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same author

Sepsis policy, guidelines, and standards in Canada: a jurisdictional scoping review.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Machine Learning Used in Communicable Disease Control: A Scoping Review.

Public health reviews·2026
Same author

Predicting Dementia Risk: Progress, Pitfalls, and Priorities.

International journal of public health·2026
Same author

Are diagnostic technologies for alzheimer's disease and dementia cost-effective? A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026
Same journal

Development and Validation of a Brief Healthcare Insecurity Scale in a Sample of U.S. Adults Living with and without HIV.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

A Competency Framework for Health Technology Assessment Expertise: Results from a Delphi Study.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Physician-led Switching from Reference Biologics to Biosimilars: What is the Effect on selected Health-Related Outcomes and Costs for IBD Patients in Germany?

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Critical Comments by the European Medicines Agency on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Regulatory Submissions (2020-2023).

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Interpreting the Economic Value of TPEx in Recurrent or Metastatic HNSCC: The Importance of Decision Context, Utility Timing, and Treatment Burden.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Development, use and psychometric properties of vision and hearing bolt-ons for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K

Validity, Reliability, and Framing Effects in Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off Studies: A Systematic Review.

Victoria Chechulina1, Andrew Chu2, Quang Hung Lam2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
|November 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review examined how equity-efficiency trade-off studies assess validity, reliability, and framing effects. Most studies reported acceptable validity or reliability, but methodological rigor varied, impacting public value elicitation.

Keywords:
equity-efficiency trade-offframing effectsreliabilityvalidity

More Related Videos

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Public Health Policy
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Health system resource allocation necessitates balancing equity and efficiency.
  • Public values, crucial for guiding these trade-offs, are often elicited through choice experiments.
  • Current methods for eliciting equity-efficiency trade-offs lack standardization, leading to concerns about the robustness of findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review equity-efficiency trade-off studies.
  • To assess the consideration of validity, reliability, and framing effects in these studies.
  • To identify methodological challenges for future research on inequity aversion.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted in May 2025.
  • Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts.
  • Data extraction and quality assessment were performed on identified studies.

Main Results:

  • Out of 122 identified studies, 33% addressed validity, reliability, or framing effects.
  • Validity was most commonly assessed against expected outcomes; reliability by repeated testing.
  • While most studies reported good validity/reliability, framing effects were less frequently assessed.

Conclusions:

  • Methodological rigor in assessing validity, reliability, and framing effects is inconsistent across studies.
  • Addressing these methodological challenges is crucial for improving future choice experiments.
  • Enhanced study designs can lead to more robust estimations of public values and inequity aversion.