Effect of left bundle branch area pacing on cardiac remodeling and function: propensity score matching with right
Shigeng Zhang1, Zongbin Li2, Junfang Guo1
1Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University, 8 # Dianli Road, Zhenjiang, 212002, China.
Background:
Conventional right ventricular pacing (RVP) causes cardiac dyssynchrony, and increases risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM), heart failure hospitalization and mortality. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a promising physiological pacing modality, we compared the effect of LBBAP on cardiac function with RVP in patients with atrioventricular block (AVB).
Methods:
A total of 118 patients with AVB who successfully underwent LBBAP were enrolled between June 2019 and June 2022. Among them, 110 patients with a baseline LVEF ≥ 50% were propensity-matched 1:1 with 49 patients who underwent RVP during the same period. Ultimately, 41 patients with well-matched baseline characteristics in both groups were included in the analysis. Echocardiographic parameters and NYHA classification at 1-year follow-up were compared between the groups.
Results:
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remained stable in patients with LVEF ≥ 50% (62.9 ± 2.9 vs. 62.9 ± 3.3, P = 0.960), and improved significantly in patients with LVEF < 50% (58.0 ± 9.9% vs. 44.2 ± 5.5%, P < 0.05) at 1-year follow-up in the LBBAP group. Propensity score matching for baseline characteristics yielded 41 matched pairs. Changes in LVEF and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) in the LBBAP group were significantly different from those in the RVP group: LVEF [-2.8(-5.0, -0.6), P = 0.015] and LVEDD [1.3(0.1, 2.5), P = 0.036], respectively. Compared with baseline, NYHA classification improved significantly in the LBBAP group (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.2, P < 0.05), while remained changed in the RVP group (1.3 ± 0.4 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3, P = 0.232). LBBAP showed a tendency to reduce PICM compared with RVP (0% vs. 9.8%), though the difference was not significant (P = 0.124).
Conclusions:
LBBAP might be a preferable pacing modality to improve cardiac remodeling and function in patients requiring high ventricular pacing burden compared with conventional RVP.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Heart Rate
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction


