Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Caesarean section on maternal request - a qualitative study of stakeholders´ views
Maria Johansson Offerman1, Inger K Holmström2,3, Mio Fredriksson3
1School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Division of Caring Sciences and Health Care Pedagogics, Mälardalen University, Box 883, Västerås, 721 23, Sweden. Maria.johansson.offerman@mdu.se.
Stakeholders view caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR) as a valid choice despite risks, emphasizing informed decision-making and continuity of care. Addressing distrust and resource allocation are key to equitable maternity services.
Area of Science:
- Maternal Health
- Healthcare Policy
- Bioethics
Background:
- Caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR) presents ethical and clinical challenges in Sweden.
- Existing research on CSMR primarily focuses on women and healthcare providers, with limited insight into stakeholder perspectives.
- Regional variations in Sweden suggest potential inequities in care provision for CSMR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the views of Swedish healthcare stakeholders on CSMR.
- To explore stakeholder perspectives on CSMR in relation to medical considerations, individual autonomy, and societal values.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study employing a reflexive thematic analysis approach.
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 key stakeholders.
- Participants included regional politicians, policymakers, national authority representatives, and organizational representatives.
Main Results:
- CSMR is viewed as a legitimate option for some women, with medical risks acknowledged but not always disqualifying.
- Decision-making processes for CSMR are complex, with a strong emphasis on the need for support, guidance, and emotional continuity of care.
- Distrust in maternity care is linked to media representation and inconsistent CSMR handling; economic concerns involve resource allocation and public healthcare scope.
- Private payment for planned caesarean sections was broadly rejected.
Conclusions:
- CSMR is a complex issue with varied perspectives on individual and population-level risks.
- Informed decision-making, incorporating medical and psychological risks with crucial counseling, is essential.
- Continuity of midwife care models may serve as an alternative to CSMR for some women.
- Stakeholder engagement is vital for establishing clear guidelines, ensuring equitable care, and fostering trust in the healthcare system.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

