Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026
Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
What is the most suitable medicine ball mass for assessing maximal upper-extremity power in the seated single-arm
Matthieu Degot1, Isabelle Rogowski1, Alexandre Dingome1
1Universite Lyon 1, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, UR7424, Villeurbanne, France.
Introduction:
Different medicine ball (MB) masses are used for the unilateral MB push to indirectly determine upper-extremity power. This study aimed to identify the most suitable MB mass for assessing maximal upper-extremity power through the seated single-arm horizontal push test (SSAHPT).
Methods:
Thirty-four athletes performed the SSAHPT with three different MB masses (1 kg, 3 kg, and 5 kg) and the unilateral ballistic bench press test. For each limb, the SSAHPT distance was determined, and the maximal power (Pmax) and force-velocity profile (SFv) were extracted from the unilateral bench press test.
Results:
For the 1-kg and 3-kg MB, SSAHPT performance variation was explained by the variations of Pmax and Dominance (R2 = 0.82-0.86), with the effect of Pmax about 5.5 times greater than the effect of Dominance. For the 5-kg MB mass, SSAHPT performance variation was explained by the variations of Pmax, Dominance, and SFv (R2 = 0.85). The effect of Pmax was 5.3 and 1.6 times greater than the effect of Dominance and SFv, respectively.
Conclusion:
To limit the involvement of the athlete's force-velocity profile in SSAHPT performance with a 5-kg MB mass, it is advisable to use either a 1-kg or 3-kg MB mass when SSAHPT is employed to reflect maximal upper-extremity power.
