Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
The effect of digital connector design on flexural and fracture strength in implant-supported bridge restorations
1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Avsar Street, 46060, Onikisubat, Kahramanmaras, Turkey. dtbestecetin@gmail.com.
Abstract:
To investigate the fracture and apparent flexural strength at fracture of three-unit implant-supported bridge restorations at different connector cross-sectional areas according to material type, produced on ti-base abutments using the CAD-CAM system. A total of 42 three-unit implant-supported bridge restorations were designed digitally (maxillary canine and second premolar as abutment and 1st premolar as a pontic). Two main groups (N = 21) were created to be manufactured from monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate. Then, each group was divided into three subgroups (n = 7) according to the connector cross-sectional area (9 mm2, 12 mm2, 15 mm2 for monolithic zirconia; 12 mm2, 16 mm2, 20 mm2 for lithium disilicate). The samples were subjected to a fracture test on a universal testing machine and the values obtained were formulated to calculate the apparent flexural strength at fracture. In terms of fracture strength, there were statistically significant differences for both monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). In terms of apparent flexural strength at fracture, there were statistically significant differences for both monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate (p = 0.012, p = 0.007, respectively). When monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate samples with a common connector cross-sectional area (12 mm2) were compared, it was found that monolithic zirconia was statistically significantly stronger (p = 0.002). Under the present static test conditions, monolithic zirconia can be used as three-unit bridges safely in the premolar region. Lithium disilicate can also be used as three-unit bridges in the premolar region; in cases where there is sufficient connector area and the patient does not have parafunctional habits. As a result, increasing the connector cross-sectional area increases the strength significantly (p < 0.05).
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
03:02Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cable Subjected to a Distributed Load
Design Example: Strain Gauge Bridge or Wheatstone Bridge
Bending of Members Made of Several Materials
Hooke's Law determines stress in each material, stating that stress is proportional to strain but varies due to each material's...
Design Example: Distributing Reinforcements in Concrete Sections
Effects of Creep
Design Example: Joints in Concrete Pavements
Contraction joints are typically formed by sawing a groove into the concrete shortly after it has hardened. This creates a weakened vertical plane, deliberately encouraging cracking at...