Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
Published on: July 15, 2015
Comprehensive review on outcomes from Phase 3 clinical trials of drugs in multiple myeloma
Sandeep Singh1, Vivek Uttam1, Shafiul Haque2
1Non-coding RNA and Cancer Biology Lab, Department of Zoology, Central University of Punjab, Ghudda, 151401, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Abstract:
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell malignancy characterized by clinical heterogeneity, high relapse rates, and eventual drug resistance despite advances in therapy. Over the past two decades, phase 3 clinical trials have redefined MM management by integrating novel agents, monoclonal antibodies, and cellular therapies into frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. CD38-targeting antibodies, particularly daratumumab- and isatuximab-based regimens, have demonstrated superior depth of response, prolonged progression-free survival (PFS), and improved overall survival (OS) across transplant-eligible, transplant-ineligible, and relapsed populations. Proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)-based triplets and quadruplets, such as bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd), carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD), and pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) combinations, have further enhanced treatment efficacy, while maintenance strategies primarily lenalidomide-based remain central to sustaining remission, with ongoing trials evaluating MRD-guided approaches. The emergence of B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies, exemplified by idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel, has transformed outcomes in heavily pretreated, triple-class refractory patients, providing durable responses and quality of life benefits. Despite these advances, therapeutic decisions must consider patient frailty, cytogenetic risk, and prior treatment exposure. Future directions emphasize optimizing sequencing strategies, integrating bispecific antibodies, and validating MRD as a biomarker for treatment cessation. This review consolidates evidence from recent phase 3 trials to provide clinicians with an updated framework for personalized, risk-adapted management of MM.
More Related Videos
05:32Multimodal Bioluminescent and Positronic-emission Tomography/Computational Tomography Imaging of Multiple Myeloma Bone Marrow Xenografts in NOG Mice
Published on: January 7, 2019
10:04Establishment of a Human Multiple Myeloma Xenograft Model in the Chicken to Study Tumor Growth, Invasion and Angiogenesis
Published on: May 1, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Survival Analysis