Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Urodynamic Method for Precise Urine Measurement in Awake Mice with Neurogenic Bladder
Published on: June 7, 2024
The Splash Zone: Efficacy of Ureteroscopic Adapters in Containing Hazardous Leak
Sami A Mostafa1, Hailey Frye1, Vishnuvardhan Ganesan1
1Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Introduction:
Ureteroscopic procedures pose a splash hazard to urologists from irrigant contaminated with urine, blood, or caustic substances, risking health and vision. While ureteroscopic adapters aim to minimize fluid leakage, their efficacy remains unstandardized, with high-pressure irrigation potentially generating hazardous spray. This study aimed to evaluate the potential for hazardous leak of various ureteroscopic adapters.
Methods:
Six different ureteroscopic adapters were assessed while performing ureteroscopy through a tissue-realistic kidney and ureter model at various levels of pressurized saline generated via a pressure bag and a single-action pumping system (SAPS) with and without a stone basket in the working channel. Leaking was classified as a drip (non-projectile leakage), a spray (small-volume projectile leak), or a splash (large-volume projectile leak). Hazardous spray was defined as any projectile leakage. Ultraviolet fluorescent stain was instilled in the irrigation and utilized to measure the maximal spray distance from the surgeon.
Results:
The Gyrus Adjustable Biopsy Port Seal had the highest potential for splash, including at gravity. Other adapters that exhibited hazardous leakage include the Gyrus Blue Silicone Seal with a basket in place and the Merit Hemostasis Valve while under high pressure using SAPS. Only one valve demonstrated no leak under any simulated circumstances (the Medtronic Piton). The Cook Check-Flo Adapter and Boston Scientific Urolok II demonstrated nonhazardous leakage. In the second arm of the experiment, maximal spray distance using the Gyrus Adjustable Biopsy Port Seal was 14.4 feet.
Conclusion:
Ureteroscopic adapter leakage can be variable among adapters, and surgeons should be aware of the hazardous potential for exposure.
More Related Videos
06:39Technical Modification of the Terminal Ureter During Total Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Published on: November 22, 2019
03:51Author Spotlight: Advanced Treatment of Seminal Duct Blockage Employing Endoscopy-Mediated Semen Channel Refluviation
Published on: December 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management