Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Protein Engineering – Harnessing Evolution Through PRANCE and Lab Automation
Published on: January 12, 2024
A Guide to an Effective Peer Review
Tanping Wong1, Riya N Soni2, Casey Glass3
1Division of Hospital Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
None:
Peer review is a fundamental element of the modern scientific publishing process. It serves an important role in evaluating the quality of research and refining submitted manuscripts into accurate and impactful contributions to the existing scientific literature. Over the last two decades, opportunities for publication have skyrocketed, and the demand for peer reviewers has grown exponentially. Although the peer review process provides significant benefits, recruiting individuals as peer reviewers can be challenging. The most common obstacles include the time commitment needed to provide meaningful reviews and uncertainty about how to prepare a cohesive and beneficial peer review. This article offers prospective peer reviewers structured guidance to build confidence and enable them to perform effective reviews.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Proofreading
Proofreading
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
Feedback Inhibition
Feedback Loops
Review and Preview

