Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Field Collection and Laboratory Maintenance of Canopy-Forming Giant Kelp to Facilitate Restoration
Published on: June 7, 2024
Conservation Planning for Promoting Ecosystem Service Provisioning Outside Protected Area Networks
Florence Godfrey Tarimo1,2, Francis Moyo1, Claire Kelly3
1Department of Sustainable Agriculture, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology Arusha Tanzania.
Protecting areas outside of national parks is crucial for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Restoring wildlife corridors in Tanzania could yield millions annually, highlighting the need for integrated conservation strategies.
Area of Science:
- Ecology and conservation biology
- Environmental economics
- Land use science
Background:
- Habitat loss due to unsustainable land use is a major driver of biodiversity loss, intensified by human population growth.
- Protected Area Networks (PANs) are a key conservation strategy, but can neglect biodiversity and ecosystem services (ESs) in areas outside protected areas (OPANs).
- Understanding human-biodiversity interactions in OPANs is vital for effective conservation and sustainable ecosystem service provision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the monetary value of selected ESs in Tanzania's OPANs using an ecosystem-based conservation (EBC) framework.
- To evaluate how biodiversity and land use/land cover (LULC) types influence ES values in OPANs.
- To model the potential ES benefits of restoring priority wildlife corridors by 2030.
Main Methods:
- Application of a novel ecosystem-based conservation (EBC) framework in Tanzania.
- Assessment of biodiversity and LULC types to determine monetary values of selected ESs in OPANs.
- Scenario modeling for future ES generation from wildlife corridor restoration.
Main Results:
- Waterbodies provided the highest ES value (US$12.8 billion) through water provision and flood control.
- OPANs in miombo woodlands showed high ES value (US$12.4 billion), driven by flood control, water provision, and carbon storage.
- Restoring degraded land in wildlife corridors could generate US$62.8 million annually, with carbon storage as the primary contributor.
Conclusions:
- The monetary value of ESs in OPANs is significant and influenced by LULC types, biodiversity, and degradation levels.
- Integrating OPANs into EBC frameworks is essential for holistic conservation, linking local restoration efforts with national and global biodiversity goals.
- Restoration of degraded lands within wildlife corridors presents a substantial opportunity for enhancing ESs and biodiversity conservation.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
What is Conservation Biology?
Conservation of Small Populations
Conservation of Declining Populations
Sustainable Development
Ecological Niches

