Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Integrated Representations of Threat and Controllability in the Lateral Frontal Pole
Joanne E Stasiak1,2, Jingyi Wang1,2, Neil M Dundon1,2,3
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.
None:
Emotional processing is ubiquitous in everyday life, informing goal pursuit not only in response to current demands but also in anticipation of future outcomes. Lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) function supports cognitive control, and emerging evidence suggests a unique role for its anterior-most region-the lateral frontal pole (FPl)-in integrating putatively amygdala-originated emotion signals with goal information. However, whether these organizational properties of LPFC are expressed during the anticipation of future threat remains unknown. Here, we used finite impulse response modeling and pattern similarity analysis to examine dynamic engagement and representational properties of distinct LPFC regions during threat anticipation requiring goal-directed action. Healthy participants (n = 67, 51 female) were scanned during a threat-of-shock paradigm consisting of a prolonged (18 sec) countdown to possible shock administration. Threat unpleasantness and controllability were manipulated orthogonally: In controllable trials, participants could avoid an unpleasant or mild shock by making a successful time-sensitive response; in uncontrollable trials, shocks were administered regardless of performance. LPFC robustly coded for anticipated threat unpleasantness, with FPl showing the strongest modulation by threat unpleasantness and controllability relative to caudal and mid-LPFC regions. While caudal and mid-LPFC maintained independent representations of threat unpleasantness and controllability, FPl held conjunctive threat-and-controllability representations, which were associated with successful motor performance following unpleasant threat anticipation. Stronger conjunctive FPl representations were also associated with greater inverse amygdala-FPl coupling. Together, these findings provide insight into LPFC organization under naturalistic emotional challenges and highlight a key role for FPl in integrating affective and control-related information during threat anticipation to support goal-directed action.
More Related Videos
13:08Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
09:14Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: March 14, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Functional Brain Systems: Limbic System
Lobes of the Cerebrum
Frontal lobe
The frontal lobes, located behind the forehead, are the command center of our brain, controlling personality, intelligence, and voluntary muscle movements....
Lateralization
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory