Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Testing for the footprints of stabilization economic policy in forecast errors
Wojciech Charemza1,2, Christian Francq3, Radu Lupu4
1Vistula University, Poland.
None:
This paper introduces a novel statistical test, the Policy Effects Lagrange Multiplier (PELM) test, to detect stabilization policy effects in the distribution of forecast errors from dynamic financial models. Traditional analyses of policy impact typically rely on explicit policy information or direct intervention data, which are often unavailable or incomplete. In contrast, the proposed PELM test infers policy footprints from the distribution of forecast errors alone. Empirically applied to sovereign bond yield data from 33 countries before the Russian financial crisis of 2014, the test identifies countries showing stabilization policy footprints. Subsequent analysis shows that significant budgetary improvements were observed for years following the crisis in the group of countries where our test statistically confirmed stabilization policies. This confirms the rationale of test foundations and also indicates its predictive properties. Robustness checks further validate these findings across various model specifications and sensitivity scenarios. The proposed PELM test offers policymakers and researchers a powerful tool for evaluating stabilization policies, facilitating better forecasting and assessing policy efficiency in diverse economic contexts without necessitating detailed policy intervention data.
Related Concept Videos
Econometric Views (EViews)
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Margin of Error
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

