Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

04:50
Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
780
The Patient Self-Administered Inflammatory Arthritis Detection Study.
Norma K Biln1, Nick Bansback2, Charlyn Black3
1N.K. Biln, PhD, Faculty of Medicine, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
The Journal of Rheumatology
|December 1, 2025
Summary
Patient questionnaires like the Early Inflammatory Arthritis Questionnaire (EIAQ) can help identify inflammatory arthritis (IA) early. Combining questions from EIAQ and CaFaSpA improved diagnostic accuracy, supporting their routine use.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Early diagnosis and treat-to-target strategies are crucial for improving outcomes in inflammatory arthritis (IA).
- Standardized patient-completed questionnaires can potentially reduce diagnostic delays by aiding referral decisions.
- This study investigated the effectiveness of two validated questionnaires in a Canadian rheumatology setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the discriminatory referral performance of the Early Inflammatory Arthritis Questionnaire (EIAQ) and Case Finding Axial Spondyloarthritis (CaFaSpA) in newly referred rheumatology patients.
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of these questionnaires in identifying inflammatory arthritis (IA).
- To explore the potential of combining questionnaire items for improved IA prediction.
Main Methods:
- Patients completed the EIAQ and CaFaSpA questionnaires.
- Predictive scores were calculated using existing algorithms and compared against rheumatologist diagnoses (reference standard).
- Discriminative performance was assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity; exploratory regression models were used.
Main Results:
- Of 92 participants, 30 had time-sensitive IA, 35 other IA, and 27 non-IA. Referral times varied by IA type and patient demographics.
- The EIAQ alone showed moderate discriminative performance (AUC 0.59).
- Algorithms combining EIAQ and CaFaSpA questions achieved higher AUCs, up to 0.80, indicating improved predictive capability.
Conclusions:
- Routine collection of EIAQ and CaFaSpA questionnaires is feasible and useful for discriminating between patients with and without IA.
- Optimized algorithms using questionnaire data show promise for enhancing early IA detection and referral decisions.

