Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
What Is the Cost Impact of Second Opinions in Oncology? A Retrospective Review
Benjamin R Roman1,2, Allison Lipitz-Snyderman2,3, Susan Chimonas2,3
1Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Purpose:
Second opinions in oncology may optimize treatment plans, resulting in improved outcomes such as prognosis and morbidity. Changes in treatment plans are often de-escalations in treatment intensity. However, data on the cost impact of changes in cancer treatment resulting from second opinions are limited.
Methods:
We used a cohort of 120 patients who presented to a high-volume cancer center for a second opinion and also had a documented first opinion-30 patients each from four disease types: colorectal, head and neck, lung, and myeloma. For the 43 total patients who had a change in treatment from the second opinion compared with the first opinion, we estimated costs of treatment for the first and second opinions across the modalities of surgery, radiation, and drug treatment.
Results:
Among the 43 patients with a change between the first and second opinions, seven patients had a higher cost from the second opinion, 31 had a lower cost, and five had the same cost. Averaged across all 120 cases-43 with changes in treatment and the rest without-mean cost savings were $15,015 in US dollars (USD) per patient, ranging by disease type from $2,517 USD (lung) to $43,437 USD (myeloma). Decreases in cost were due to less-intensive surgery or drug therapy regimens, or shifts from treatment to no treatment (observation).
Conclusion:
Further investigation is needed across cancer types and in other settings to confirm the finding of de-escalations and resulting cost savings from second opinions.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Standards of Care II

