Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
A comparative study of the 30-item ProQOL 5, 12-item brief ProQOL-12, and 9-item short ProQOL scales in Slovak
Denis Deriglazov1,2, Júlia Halamová3, Maya Schroevers2
1Institute of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynské luhy 4, Bratislava, 821 05, Slovakia.
Abstract:
The Professional Quality of Life scale (ProQOL) is the most widely used tool to assess compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction in people working in helping professions (e.g., health care professionals, teachers, police officers). However, psychometric concerns have been raised, which have led to the development of two revised, shortened versions: the Brief ProQOL-12 and the 9-item Short ProQOL. However, the psychometric qualities of these shortened versions still need to be demonstrated. This study compared the validity and reliability of the original and two shortened ProQOL versions. The cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 639 helping professionals from Slovakia. We first evaluated model fit and reliability in terms of internal consistency. Convergent validity was examined by testing the relationships between the three ProQOL versions and two validated measures of compassion (Forms of Self-Criticising/Attacking & Self-Reassuring Scale; Sussex-Oxford Compassion for the Self/Others scales). Both the Brief ProQOL-12 (CFI = 0.957, RMSEA = 0.068) and the Short ProQOL (CFI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.061) showed superior model fit and factor distinctions, compared to the original ProQOL 5 (CFI = 0.704, RMSEA = 0.097), and better convergent validity in terms of higher AVE values (> 0.51). For all three ProQOL versions, the internal consistency was good (α/ω > 0.8 across subscales), except for burnout in ProQOL 5, which was relatively low (α = 0.731; ω = 0.661). Also the convergent validity was supported for all three ProQOL versions, as indicated by significant positive correlations with other measures of compassion. The Brief ProQOL-12 and the 9-item Short ProQOL both outperformed the 30-item ProQOL 5 in terms of model fit and structural validity. Their reliability and convergent validity was supported in a large group of helping professionals from Slovakia. With an additional item per subscale, the Brief ProQOL-12 may offer a better balance between brevity and construct coverage. Both shorter scales may be valuable for both research and practical applications and have potential to enhance professionals' well-being by allowing for a quick screening, continuous monitoring and tailored interventions for helping professionals.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Cochran's Q Test
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Surveys
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

