Recent progress in genomic prediction for Hanwoo cattle and its implications for beef quality: review
Monira Akter Mou1, Md Azizul Haque1, Jong-Joo Kim1
1Department of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.
Animal Bioscience
|December 2, 2025
Summary
Genomic selection (GS) enhances genetic gain in Hanwoo cattle by integrating genomic data for improved breeding. This review explores genomic prediction (GP) methods to boost meat quality and profitability in Korean beef production.
Area of Science:
- Animal Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
- Beef Cattle Breeding
Background:
- Hanwoo cattle (HC) are prized for superior marbling and flavor.
- Genetic improvement programs in HC focus on enhancing carcass and meat quality traits.
- Genomic selection (GS) is crucial for accelerating genetic gain in HC breeding.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the application of genomic prediction (GP) methods for improving Hanwoo beef quality.
- To analyze breeder interest in GS for selecting optimal prediction models for specific traits.
- To provide a resource for leveraging Hanwoo's genetic potential in the Korean beef industry.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on genomic prediction (GP) methods.
- Analysis of GP's effectiveness compared to traditional pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP).
- Evaluation of GP for carcass and meat quality traits in Hanwoo cattle.
Main Results:
- Genomic selection (GS) offers superior prediction accuracy over PBLUP for Hanwoo cattle.
- Various GP methods have demonstrated success in improving carcass and meat quality traits.
- Choosing the right GP model is vital, depending on the trait's genetic architecture.
Conclusions:
- Genomic selection (GS) is indispensable for accelerating genetic gain and improving meat quality in Hanwoo cattle.
- GP methods are essential for optimizing breeding programs and increasing profitability.
- This review serves as a guide for Hanwoo breeders in selecting appropriate GP strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Heritability
566
Heritability is a statistical concept that measures the degree to which genetic differences among individuals contribute to trait variations within a population. It is a fundamental idea in genetics, often prone to misinterpretation. Heritability is expressed as a percentage, reflecting the proportion of variation in a specific trait across a population that can be linked to genetic differences. However, it's important to understand that heritability does not determine how "genetic"...
566
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
15.2K
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
15.2K
Pedigree Analysis
88.7K
Overview
88.7K
Polygenic Traits
68.8K
When more than one gene is responsible for a given phenotype, the trait is considered polygenic. Human height is a polygenic trait. Studies have uncovered hundreds of loci that influence height, and there are believed to be many more. Due to the high number of genes involved, as well as environmental and nutritional factors, height varies significantly within a given population. The distribution of height forms a bell-shaped curve, with relatively few individuals in the population at the...
68.8K
Improving Translational Accuracy
14.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.0K
Improving Translational Accuracy
3.5K
3.5K


