Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Analyzing Tumor Gene Expression Factors with the CorExplorer Web Portal
Published on: October 11, 2019
A prognostic model for uveal melanoma in Asian populations: a comparative analysis of clinical features and gene
Jingting Luo1, Yuning Chen1, Zhaoxun Feng2
1Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Lab, Medical Artificial Intelligence Research and Verification Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 Dongjiaominxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, P. R. China.
Background:
Uveal melanoma (UM), the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults, shows racial disparities in incidence, genetic drivers, and clinical outcomes. While most prognostication models are based on Caucasian populations, Asians demonstrate distinct molecular profiles, necessitating population-specific risk stratification.
Methods:
This study analyzed 53 Asian UM tumors, 17 normal choroidal tissues (TRACE database), and 80 Caucasian UM samples (TCGA database). Differential gene analysis, immune microenvironment profiling, and survival modeling were performed. A 7-gene prognostic signature was developed by LASSO regression and validated across cohorts, with drug sensitivity predicted using GDSC2 data.
Results:
The Asian UM exhibited 3,827 tumor-specific differentially expressed genes (DEGs) compared to the normal choroid, with enrichment in PI3K-Akt signalling, and 3,814 race-specific DEGs compared to Caucasians, suggesting specific disease pathways and variations in the tumor microenvironment. The tumor microenvironment in Asian UM exhibited increased immunological activation (M1 macrophages, PD-L1, CD8; p < 0.05), while Caucasian uveal melanoma was marked by immunosuppressive predominance (M2 macrophages, MDSCs). The seven-gene prognostic model (MMP2, LRAT, NOG, IHH, CDH18, MYH11, and SELE) exhibited strong predictive efficacy in Asians (AUC: 0.979, 0.924, and 0.984 for 1, 3, and 5-year survival) but was less successful in Caucasians. High-risk scores correlated with metastasis (12/26 vs. 4/27; p = 0.02) and had independent prognostic value.
Conclusions:
This cross-racial UM study reveals significant molecular and immune differences, indicating that Asian UM may be more responsive to immunotherapy The population-specific prognostic model improves our understanding of molecular differences in Asian and Caucasian UM, warranting further validation in multiethnic cohorts.
More Related Videos
05:46Implantation and Evaluation of Melanoma in the Murine Choroid via Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 2, 2022
07:47Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023