Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

953
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
953
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the robustness and readiness of large frontier models in health AI applications.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Analytics Methodology to Quantify MRI Exam Utilization.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same author

Advances and Challenges in Pharmacokinetic Modeling for PET Imaging: Compartment Models, Input Functions, and Quantitative Techniques.

Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)·2026
Same author

The Potential Expertise Paradox in AI-Assisted Radiology.

Radiology·2026
Same author

Anatomical dynamics define cancer cachexia subtypes and identify systemic inflammation as a marker of lethal wasting.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Toward protocol simplification: Deep learning-based image synthesis in three-phase CT urography.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Model-Assisted Second-Reader Quality Control of Chinese-Language Ultrasound Reports: A Retrospective Imaging Informatics Study.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Where Your Eyes Go: How AI Output Design Impacts Reading Behavior.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

How is Bias Learned in Medical Image Analysis Models? An Exploration of the Encoding of Demographic Information in Deep Learning Models Trained to Detect Abnormalities on Chest X-Rays.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

AI-Based Opportunistic CT Risk Assessment Using TotalSegmentator in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Computationally Efficient and Improved Brain Tumor Recognition System by MRI-Segmentation Integrated Classification Network.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Ultrasound Domain Adaptation for Robust Kidney Segmentation via Spectral-Similarity-Guided Translation.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K

From Embeddings to Accuracy: Comparing Foundation Models for Radiographic Classification.

Xue Li1, Jameson Merkow2, Noel C F Codella2

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. xue.li@wisc.edu.

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
|December 2, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Foundation models provide transferable embeddings for medical imaging. MedImageInsight embeddings with adapter models achieved high accuracy in radiography classification, outperforming traditional methods and showing computational efficiency and fairness.

Keywords:
Adapter trainingEmbeddingFoundation modelsRadiographic image classification

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.5K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medical Imaging
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Foundation models offer robust, transferable embeddings for machine learning tasks.
  • These embeddings are applicable to diverse domains, including medical imaging diagnostics.
  • Lightweight adapter models can leverage these embeddings for efficient model training.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate foundation model-derived embeddings for training lightweight adapter models in multi-class radiography classification.
  • To compare the performance of adapter models against end-to-end training of a convolutional neural network.
  • To assess the computational efficiency and fairness of the adapter models.

Main Methods:

  • Extracted embeddings from seven foundation models (DenseNet121, BiomedCLIP, Med-Flamingo, MedImageInsight, MedSigLIP, Rad-DINO, CXR-Foundation) using 8842 radiographs.
  • Trained adapter models (KNN, LR, SVM, RF, MLP) using these embeddings for classification.
  • Compared performance using mean area under the curve (mAUC) and conducted Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and fairness analyses.

Main Results:

  • MedImageInsight embeddings with SVM or MLP adapters achieved the highest mAUC (93.1%), surpassing a fully finetuned DenseNet121 (87.2%).
  • Most adapter models demonstrated computational efficiency, training in minutes and inferring in seconds on CPU.
  • Fairness analysis showed minimal performance disparities across gender and age groups.

Conclusions:

  • Foundation model embeddings, particularly from MedImageInsight, enable accurate, efficient, and equitable radiographic diagnostic classification via lightweight adapters.
  • This approach offers a practical alternative to computationally intensive end-to-end training for clinical applications.
  • The study confirms the utility of foundation model embeddings for developing high-performing and fair medical imaging AI tools.