Community Engagement in Long Covid: Insights From the Boston COVID Recovery Cohort
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Community engagement in long Covid research is vital. Recommendations include dedicated funding, involving engagement specialists early, and empowering community members in leadership roles to enhance equity in research outcomes.
Area Of Science
- Public Health
- Clinical Research
- Community Engagement
Background
- The National Institutes of Health initiated the multi-centre observational study Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) in 2021.
- Six Boston academic medical centers formed the Boston COVID Recovery Cohort (BCRC) as part of the RECOVER initiative.
- The BCRC developed and implemented a community engagement model, sharing its experiences and recommendations.
Purpose Of The Study
- To share lessons and recommendations from the BCRC's community engagement model.
- To inform future community engagement strategies in long Covid research.
- To enhance the equity impact of long Covid research through effective engagement.
Main Methods
- Established a BCRC Community Partnership Table with diverse stakeholders including community partners, equity leaders, researchers, and health system collaborators.
- Co-developed a charter outlining goals for research, education, clinical care, social support, and policy change.
- Engaged patients, providers, caregivers, and legislators through multiple communication channels.
Main Results
- Faced challenges including pandemic uncertainties, structural barriers to engagement, and varying organizational structures.
- Achieved successes through invested leadership, inclusive network building, co-production, flexible communication, and centering communities and patients.
- Connected with the legislature to influence broader policy impacts.
Conclusions
- Healthcare funders should allocate specific time and resources for community engagement in research.
- Study consortia must integrate community engagement specialists into decision-making roles from the project's inception.
- Community members should be given prominent leadership positions in research engagement efforts.

