Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
Published on: June 8, 2020
Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Dominican Republic
Alice Agyekum1, Sophie Wagner1, Karla Marie Disla Pineda2
1Columbia University Irving Medical Center.
Background:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is increasing worldwide, particularly in middle-income Caribbean countries like the Dominican Republic (DR), where CRC is now the third-most prevalent cancer. Despite this trend, no national or regional CRC screening guidelines exist across the Caribbean region, and screening is not routinely performed in the DR. In this study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of four CRC screening strategies versus no screening.
Methods:
We developed a Markov model of CRC to compare no screening (natural history, NH) to four screening strategies: colonoscopy every ten years (Colo), sigmoidoscopy every five years (Sig), biennial fecal immunohistochemical test (FIT), and biennial fecal occult blood test (FOBT), from age 45 to 75. Model inputs were derived from international trials, GLOBOCAN, SEER, and local data. We assumed 60.6% adherence to screening for all strategies. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted. Secondary outcomes included CRC incidence, mortality, and number of lifetime colonoscopies.
Findings:
In the NH strategy, 2.3% developed and 1.0% died from CRC, with a lifetime cost of $73.89 per person. FIT reduced CRC incidence by 30% and death by 37%, with a lifetime cost of $101.39 and ICER of $2,134.75 per DALY averted. Colo was more effective, reducing CRC incidence by 50% and death by 52%, but exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold (ICER: $12,903.51). FIT required 371 lifetime colonoscopies per 1,000 people vs. 1,953 for Colo. Results were most sensitive to screening test performance and test costs.
Interpretation:
Biennial FIT is a cost-effective CRC screening option for the DR, averting a significant number of CRC cases and deaths at low incremental cost. Inclusion of local data on effectiveness and acceptability of CRC screening modalities would strengthen results. These findings can inform development of CRC screening guidelines in the DR and the wider Caribbean region.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Preventive Healthcare Services