Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.6K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.2K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.2K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

413
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
413
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.0K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.5K
3.5K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robust discovery of mutational signatures using power posteriors.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Pathfinder: Parallel quasi-Newton variational inference.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026
Same author

Raw signal segmentation for estimating RNA modification from Nanopore direct RNA sequencing data.

eLife·2026
Same author

Tuning-Free Coreset Markov Chain Monte Carlo via Hot DoG.

Proceedings of machine learning research·2025
Same author

Reproducible parameter inference using bagged posteriors.

Electronic journal of statistics·2025
Same author

Simulation-Based Calibration Checking for Bayesian Computation: The Choice of Test Quantities Shapes Sensitivity.

Bayesian analysis·2025
Same journal

Classification Under Local Differential Privacy with Model Reversal and Model Averaging.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026
Same journal

Sparse Semiparametric Discriminant Analysis for High-dimensional Zero-inflated Data.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026
Same journal

Heterogeneity-aware Clustered Distributed Learning for Multi-source Data Analysis.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026
Same journal

Unsupervised Tree Boosting for Learning Probability Distributions.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026
Same journal

A Two-Stage Penalized Least Squares Method for Constructing Large Systems of Structural Equations.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026
Same journal

Bayesian Multinomial Logistic Normal Models through Marginally Latent Matrix-T Processes.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

980

A Framework for Improving the Reliability of Black-box Variational Inference.

Manushi Welandawe1, Michael Riis Andersen2, Aki Vehtari3

  • 1Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Boston University, USA.

Journal of Machine Learning Research : JMLR
|December 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Robust and automated black-box VI (RABVI) enhances Bayesian inference reliability. This framework automates optimization, detects inaccurate approximations, and balances accuracy with computational cost for better results.

Keywords:
black-box variational inferencefixed-learning ratestochastic optimizationsymmetrized KL divergence

More Related Videos

Optimization of the Retinal Vein Occlusion Mouse Model to Limit Variability
07:23

Optimization of the Retinal Vein Occlusion Mouse Model to Limit Variability

Published on: August 6, 2021

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

980
Optimization of the Retinal Vein Occlusion Mouse Model to Limit Variability
07:23

Optimization of the Retinal Vein Occlusion Mouse Model to Limit Variability

Published on: August 6, 2021

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Statistics
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • Black-box variational inference (BBVI) is a popular method for approximate Bayesian inference, offering speed and flexibility over traditional Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods.
  • However, existing stochastic optimization techniques for BBVI often lack reliability and require extensive manual tuning.
  • This necessitates the development of more robust and automated approaches for practical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce Robust and Automated Black-box VI (RABVI), a novel framework designed to significantly improve the reliability of BBVI optimization.
  • To provide a user-friendly system with minimal intuitive tuning parameters that automates complex optimization processes.
  • To enable users to effectively balance computational cost with the desired accuracy of the variational approximation.

Main Methods:

  • RABVI employs rigorously justified automation techniques for reliable optimization.
  • It adaptively adjusts the learning rate upon detecting convergence of fixed-learning-rate iterates.
  • The framework estimates symmetrized Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence and uses a novel termination criterion to balance accuracy and computational cost.

Main Results:

  • RABVI demonstrates improved robustness and accuracy in optimizing BBVI.
  • The framework successfully detects inaccurate estimates of the optimal variational approximation.
  • Simulation studies and real-world examples validate the effectiveness of RABVI.

Conclusions:

  • RABVI offers a significant advancement in making BBVI more reliable and accessible for machine learning and statistical applications.
  • The automated nature and adaptive learning rate adjustments reduce the need for expert knowledge and hand-tuning.
  • The proposed termination criterion provides a practical way to manage the trade-off between accuracy and computational resources.