Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Modified Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Trans-Hiatal Esophageal Transection
Federico Marchesi1,2, Marina Valente1,2, Francesco Tartamella1,2
1Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. (Drs. Marchesi, Cecconi, Resina, de Robertis, and Cancilla).
Background:
Totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (ILMIE) is a particularly challenging procedure. Despite recent improvements, technical difficulties, mainly in creating intrathoracic anastomosis, still account for a high rate of anastomotic leaks. We present a modified ILMIE technique, with a transhiatal esophageal transection during the laparoscopic stage, aimed at facilitating the thoracoscopic approach and overcoming some of its pitfalls.
Methods:
Twenty-four consecutive patients with Siewert I and Siewert II esophago-gastric junction tumors with a 8 cm maximum involvement of distal esophagus were included in the study and underwent modified ILMIE with transhiatal esophageal transection and transabdominal (Pfannestiel) specimen extraction. A frozen section examination of specimen margin was obtained while repositioning the patients for thoracoscopic access in prone position. An end-to-side mechanical anastomosis, reinforced by a 3-0 running suture, was performed.
Results:
There were no major intraoperative complications. Eleven patients (45.8%) had a Clavien-Dindo grade higher than 2 postoperative complication, including one (4.2%) type II anastomotic leak. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 31.5 ± 17.2 and we recorded 1 R1 resection (4.2%). Disease free survival rate at 1 year, irrespective of the pathologic stage, was 67%.
Conclusions:
Modified ILMIE seems to be a safe alternative to the traditional technique. Transabdominal specimen extraction allows a reduced minithoracotomy, a better thoracoscopic workspace and early availability of a frozen section for examination. Larger series are needed to assess possible benefits on postoperative and oncological outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...

