Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutual Inductance01:24

Mutual Inductance

3.5K
Inductance is the property of a device that tells us how effectively it induces an emf in another device. In other words, it is a physical quantity that expresses the effectiveness of a given device.
When two circuits carrying time-varying currents are close to one another, the magnetic flux through each circuit varies because of the changing current in the other circuit. Consequently, an emf is induced in each circuit by the changing current in the other. Therefore, this type of emf is called...
3.5K
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns01:13

¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns

6.5K
When protons A and X are coupled, their nuclear spin energy levels are slightly modified. This is because the energy required to excite proton A to a spin state parallel to proton X is slightly different from the energy required for it to become anti-parallel to spin X. Consequently, there are two possible excitation frequencies for A (A1 and A2), depending on the spin state of X, and vice versa. The mutual nature of coupling implies that the difference between frequencies A1 and A2, indicated...
6.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.4K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.4K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

1.8K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
1.8K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.6K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.4K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Dynamic Mutual Information Measure of Phase-Amplitude Coupling with Uncertainty Quantification.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2026
Same author

Vascular waveform analysis using Bayesian pulse deconvolution.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Sequential Probability Assignment for Outlier Detection in Heartbeat Timings.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Functionalized Adhesive Thin Flexible Electrode Arrays for Large-Scale Unobtrusive Ambulatory Monitoring of Neuromuscular Activity.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Dynamic Facial Analysis for Predicting Facial Palsy Outcomes: Comparing Landmark Detection Models and Integrating Ordinal Regression.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Simultaneous stomach-brain electrophysiology reveals dynamic coupling in human sleep.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

15.9K

A Dynamic Mutual Information Measure of Phase Amplitude Coupling.

Andrew S Perley, Todd P Coleman

    Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
    |December 3, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary

    We developed a new dynamic method to measure phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) in brain activity. This approach accurately tracks rapid changes in neural oscillations, offering insights into brain function and disease.

    More Related Videos

    Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
    09:23

    Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans

    Published on: August 16, 2017

    8.5K
    Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
    05:59

    Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

    Published on: October 6, 2023

    3.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 9, 2026

    Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
    10:28

    Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

    Published on: July 24, 2019

    15.9K
    Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans
    09:23

    Quantification of Information Encoded by Gene Expression Levels During Lifespan Modulation Under Broad-range Dietary Restriction in C. elegans

    Published on: August 16, 2017

    8.5K
    Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
    05:59

    Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis

    Published on: October 6, 2023

    3.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Computational Neuroscience
    • Signal Processing

    Background:

    • Phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) links slow and fast neural oscillations, crucial for cognition and implicated in neurological disorders.
    • Existing PAC quantification methods often use summary statistics or windowed analyses, failing to capture rapid, dynamic changes at high resolution.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce a novel dynamic mutual information measure for quantifying time-varying PAC.
    • To enable interpretable PAC estimation at single-sample resolution using state-space modeling.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a dynamic mutual information measure for PAC.
    • Employed a state-space modeling approach with a Gamma generalized linear model (GLM).
    • Incorporated a Gauss-Markov process on regression weights for dynamic estimation.

    Main Results:

    • Validated the method using synthetic data, demonstrating superior performance in tracking dynamic PAC and distinguishing coupled states.
    • Successfully applied the technique to sleep EEG data, identifying PAC during sleep spindles.
    • Showcased potential for PAC during sleep spindles as a biomarker for conditions like Alzheimer's disease.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed dynamic PAC measure offers a powerful tool for neuroscientific and clinical research.
    • This method can reveal transient neural dynamics in disease states and inform neurostimulation protocols.
    • Potential applications include real-time brain-computer interfaces and advanced neurostimulation strategies.