Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Induced Electric Fields

Induced Electric Fields

The fact that emfs are induced in circuits implies that work is being done on the conduction electrons in the wires. What can possibly be the source of this work? We know that it’s neither a battery nor a magnetic field, as a battery does not have to be present in a circuit where current is induced, and magnetic fields never do any work on moving charges. The source of the work is in fact an electric field that is induced in the wires. For example, if a stationary conductor is placed in a...

Induced Electric Fields: Applications

Induced Electric Fields: Applications

An important distinction exists between the electric field induced by a changing magnetic field and the electrostatic field produced by a fixed charge distribution. Specifically, the induced electric field is nonconservative because it does not work in moving a charge over a closed path. In contrast, the electrostatic field is conservative and does no net work over a closed path. Hence, electric potential can be associated with the electrostatic field but not the induced field. The following...

The Electrical Double Layer

The Electrical Double Layer

In the region where two bulk phases meet, an intricate electric charge distribution arises due to charge transfer, ion adsorption, molecular orientation, and charge distortion. This complex distribution is commonly referred to as the electrical double layer.When a solid electrode interfaces with ions in an electrolyte solution, the speed of electron transfer dictates the rates of oxidation and reduction. The electrode acquires a charge through the escape of atoms into the solution as cations or...

Processes at Electrodes

Processes at Electrodes

The electrode interacts with ions in the electrolyte solution at its interface. The rate of oxidation and reduction depends on the speed at which electrons can transfer through this interface. As ions attach to or leave the electrode surface, the electrode acquires a charge, and an electrical potential forms across the interface, making the process more difficult to reach equilibrium. The charge on the electrode affects the local ion concentrations in the solution, though thermal motion...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Can explainable AI scaffolding reduce cognitive load and enhance embodied expression? A quasi-experimental study of multilingual vocal learning in Bel Canto education.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same author

Model-based design and placement analysis for epidural cortical stimulation.

Journal of neural engineering·2026

Same author

Sacral Neuromodulation for Refractory Overactive Bladder: Closing the Gaps in Anatomy, Mechanisms, and Parameter Selection.

Advances in therapy·2026

Same author

Histologically Informed Multiscale Modeling of the Neuronal Elements Activated by TMS.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Dual-frequency spinal cord stimulation increases responder rates for treatment of neuropathic pain.

Pain·2026

Same author

A Roadmap to Navigate the Future of Neural Engineering.

Journal of neural engineering·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: May 23, 2011

Simulation of Spatiotemporal Current Density Distribution on Electrode-Electrolyte Interface during Deep Brain

Xuefeng Wei, Wali Sohail, Nikhil Parab

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference

|December 3, 2025

Summary

The electrode-tissue interface significantly impacts current density distribution during deep brain stimulation (DBS). Understanding this interface is crucial for optimizing DBS therapy and minimizing tissue damage.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous EEG Monitoring During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Simultaneous EEG Monitoring During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: June 17, 2013

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: May 23, 2011

Simultaneous EEG Monitoring During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Simultaneous EEG Monitoring During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: June 17, 2013

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

Area of Science:

Biomedical Engineering
Neuroscience
Electrophysiology

Background:

Current density distribution on deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes influences tissue damage, corrosion, and neural excitation.
Electrode-electrolyte/tissue interface impedance is a key factor affecting current density distribution.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the impact of the electrode-electrolyte interface on the spatiotemporal current density distribution during DBS.
To model the nonlinear impedance of the electrode-tissue interface and its effect on current flow.

Main Methods:

A finite element model of a monopolar DBS electrode was developed.
Electrode-tissue interface impedance was measured using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.
A biphasic DBS pulse was decomposed into harmonic frequency components for simulation.

Main Results:

The spatiotemporal current density pattern closely mirrored the non-uniform primary distribution at the pulse onset.
Current densities rapidly decreased during the pulse duration.
Stimulation efficiency in excitable tissues is concentrated at the pulse's beginning and near electrode edges.

Conclusions:

The electrode-electrolyte interface significantly shapes current density distribution in DBS.
Accurate modeling of interface impedance is essential for predicting DBS effects.
Optimizing stimulation parameters based on these findings can enhance therapeutic outcomes and reduce side effects.