Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Neural Circuits

Neural Circuits

Neural circuits and neuronal pools are two of the main structures found in the nervous system. Neural circuits are networks of neurons that work together to carry out a specific task or process. They consist of interconnected neurons and glial cells, which provide structural and metabolic support.
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...

Spinal Cord: Information Processing

Spinal Cord: Information Processing

The spinal cord is an integral hub for motor and sensory information that enables the brain to communicate with the peripheral nervous system (PNS). This communication consists of relaying sensory data and transmission of motor commands.
Sensory Information Processing
Sensory information processing begins at the sensory receptors located in the skin and other tissues, which detect somatic sensory stimuli such as touch, temperature, or pain. These receptors function as catalysts, initiating...

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

TuneS: Patient-specific model-based optimization of contact configuration in deep brain stimulation.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2026

Same author

Nonlinear dynamics in pulse-modulated feedback drug dosing<sup></sup>.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025

Same author

Initialization of a Disease Transmission Model.

IFAC-PapersOnLine·2024

Same author

A community effort in SARS-CoV-2 drug discovery.

Molecular informatics·2023

Same author

Bayesian monitoring of COVID-19 in Sweden.

Epidemics·2023

Same author

GRAPE: genomic relatedness detection pipeline.

F1000Research·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Intra-Operative Behavioral Tasks in Awake Humans Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

Intra-Operative Behavioral Tasks in Awake Humans Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

Published on: January 6, 2011

Mixed Integer Linear Programming for Active Contact Selection in Deep Brain Stimulation.

Anna Franziska Frigge, Alexander Medvedev

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference

|December 3, 2025

Summary

This study introduces mathematical optimization for deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming. Optimization frameworks like MILP and LP were compared, offering insights into efficient DBS parameter selection for Parkinson's disease patients.

More Related Videos

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring

Published on: July 14, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Intra-Operative Behavioral Tasks in Awake Humans Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

Intra-Operative Behavioral Tasks in Awake Humans Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

Published on: January 6, 2011

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models

Published on: August 12, 2018

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring

Published on: July 14, 2023

Area of Science:

Neurosurgery
Computational Neuroscience
Biomedical Engineering

Background:

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) programming is complex, requiring manual parameter adjustment.
Optimizing DBS parameters is crucial for therapeutic efficacy and minimizing side effects.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore mathematical optimization for DBS programming using functional subdivisions of the subthalamic nucleus (STN).
To compare a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) framework with a Linear Programming (LP) approach for DBS programming efficiency and accuracy.

Main Methods:

Development of a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) framework for dissimilar current distribution across active DBS contacts.
Comparison of MILP and LP approaches using data from ten Parkinson's disease patients undergoing DBS therapy.
Evaluation of computational efficiency and activation profile accuracy for both optimization methods.

Main Results:

MILP more accurately matched the predefined stimulation target activation profile.
LP solutions demonstrated closer resemblance to clinically applied DBS settings.
The study identified limitations of MILP, including sensitivity to target region definition and computational demands.

Conclusions:

Mathematical optimization frameworks show promise for expediting DBS programming.
Current optimization models may not fully encompass clinically relevant DBS parameter patterns.
Further refinement of optimization strategies is needed for practical clinical application in DBS therapy.