Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
Published on: February 25, 2020
AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review
Yishu Deng1,2,3,4, Tailin Li1,2,3,4, Yunze Wang1,2,3,4
1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital, and Centre for Infection Immunity and Cancer (IIC) of Zhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute (ZJU-UoE Institute), Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Artificial intelligence (AI) models can predict patient response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) by analyzing complex cancer data. This review categorizes AI approaches to improve personalized cancer treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Biomedical Informatics
Background:
- Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) shows promise but patient response varies significantly due to tumor heterogeneity.
- Predicting NIT response preoperatively is crucial for personalized cancer treatment.
- Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), offers new methods for response prediction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review AI-driven computational approaches for predicting neoadjuvant immunotherapy response.
- To categorize AI models based on predictive paradigms (indirect vs. direct) and data modalities (radiomics, pathomics, genomics, multi-omics).
- To identify current challenges and discuss strategies for advancing AI in precision immunotherapy.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of AI-driven computational approaches for NIT response prediction.
- Categorization of AI models into indirect (surrogate biomarkers) and direct (data-driven biomarkers) paradigms.
- Classification of models based on data modalities: radiomics, pathomics, genomics, and multi-omics.
Main Results:
- AI approaches can extract features from high-dimensional data to build predictive models for NIT response.
- Indirect paradigm uses AI to predict surrogate biomarkers, while the direct paradigm uses AI to identify data-driven biomarkers for clinical endpoints.
- Various data modalities offer distinct insights into tumor characteristics and treatment response.
Conclusions:
- AI holds significant potential for optimizing individualized treatment strategies in oncology.
- Current AI predictive models face biomarker-based and AI-based challenges that require further research.
- Accelerating AI integration into precision immunotherapy requires addressing these limitations and guiding future research.
More Related Videos
08:30Immunophenotyping of Orthotopic Homograft Syngeneic of Murine Primary KPC Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Flow Cytometry
Published on: October 9, 2018
07:55Flow Cytometry-Based Isolation and Therapeutic Evaluation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer
Published on: January 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...