Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

08:28
Stereolithographic 3D Printing with Renewable Acrylates
Published on: September 12, 2018
9.9K
Enhancing Biocompatibility: 3D-Printed Cyclic Olefin Copolymer Structures for Advanced Laboratory Applications
Simon Höving1, Stefanie Dörr1, Marc Akermann2
1Translationale Forschung, Miniaturisierung, Leibniz-Institut für Analytische Wissenschaften - ISAS e.V., Dortmund, Germany.
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
|December 4, 2025
Summary
3D-printed cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) and Glass + COC show promising biocompatibility for cell-based research, with comparable or improved cell viability versus standard polystyrene. Material selection is key for optimizing cell culture applications.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Cell Biology
- Additive Manufacturing
Background:
- Additive manufacturing, or 3D-printing, is vital for creating prototypes and specialized components in scientific fields.
- Biocompatibility of 3D-printed materials is critical for cell-based research and millifluidic applications, influencing cell culture and interactions with reactive substances.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the biocompatibility and performance of 3D-printed cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) and polylactic acid (PLA) compared to traditional materials.
- To assess the impact of these materials on cell viability, metabolic activity, and potential toxicity using specific cell lines.
Main Methods:
- Experiments utilized rat cardiomyocyte (H9c2) and human embryonal kidney (HEK293) cell lines.
- Assays included lactate, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide to evaluate metabolic activity, cell stress, and viability.
- Microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were employed to visualize cell growth and analyze surface characteristics.
Main Results:
- Glass + COC demonstrated increased metabolic activity and cell viability compared to standard polystyrene (PS) dishes.
- COC and PLA materials showed comparable cell viability to standard PS dishes, with a slight advantage for COC.
- Lactate assays indicated subtle increases in secretion, particularly with Glass + COC, correlating with cell viability.
Conclusions:
- 3D-printed COC and Glass + COC are biocompatible materials suitable for cell-based research and millifluidic applications.
- Material selection significantly impacts cell viability, metabolic activity, and lactate levels in cell culture.
- Microscopy and AFM analyses provide crucial insights into cell behavior and material properties for optimizing biocompatible 3D-printed applications.

