[Applicability of the London Classification to Characterize Defecation Disorders: a Retrospective Study in a Tertiary
Mauro Santana1, María Marta Piskorz1, Adriana Tevez1
1Sección Neurogastroenterología Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martin Universidad de Buenos Aires Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Argentina.
Introduction:
Chronic constipation and fecal incontinence are common functional pelvic floor disorders with a significant impact on quality of life. Although the London Classification standardizes anorectal manometric assessment, its application in Latin American populations is still limited.
Objectives:
To characterize anorectal manometric profiles according to clinical indication (constipation, fecal incontinence, or coexisting symptoms), using the London Classification.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective observational study was conducted on 413 adult patients who were evaluated using high-resolution anorectal manometry (Diversatek and ManoScan AR®) at a tertiary care center. Clinical, manometric, and sensory variables were classified according to the four domains of the London Classification and analyzed. ANOVA and chi-square tests were used for group comparisons.
Results:
Patients with constipation had higher resting and voluntary contraction pressures of the anal canal, a higher prevalence of hypertonia and dyssynergia, and higher sensory thresholds. Patients with fecal incontinence presented hypotonia, hypocontractility, and altered coordination but not dyssynergia. Patients with coexisting symptoms exhibited mixed patterns. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of the inhibitory anal rectal reflex or rectal sensory disorders.
Conclusion:
The London Classification allowed the identification of specific pathophysiological patterns based on clinical phenotypes. These findings suggest its usefulness as a standardized diagnostic tool, with clinical implications for more accurate and personalized evaluation of defecation disorders.
More Related Videos
15:49Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
03:49Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:30Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
01:25Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
01:17Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
01:29Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
01:17Chronic Bowel Disorders: Introduction
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder affecting the gastrointestinal tract. The distinctive feature is recurrent abdominal pain associated with altered bowel movements, manifesting as constipation, diarrhea, or fluctuating between both. The...
01:28Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.