Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
Treatment Interruption and Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials
Laila A Gharzai1, Emily Morris2, Matthew J Schipper2,3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Importance:
Historical evidence demonstrated that delays or interruptions in radiotherapy (RT) are associated with poorer oncologic outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Substantial concerns arose during the COVID-19 pandemic, when treatment schedules were frequently disrupted.
Objective:
To determine the association of RT interruptions with locoregional failure (LRF) and overall survival (OS).
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This retrospective review and secondary analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials (NRG/RTOG 0129, 0522, and 1016) included patients enrolled in the trials who were treated with RT. Patients with HNSCC were grouped as (1) p16-positive oropharynx (p16+ OPSCC) and (2) p16-negative oropharynx and all other subsites regardless of p16 status (called locally advanced HNSCC [LAHNSCC])). Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess the association of an RT interruption (binary model) and length of RT interruption (continuous model) with LRF and OS.
Exposures:
Presence of RT interruption.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
LRF and OS.
Results:
There were 1549 patients (200 female patients [12.9%]; mean [SD] age, 57 [6] years; 1048 p16+ OPSCC [67.7%]; 501 LAHNSCC [32.3%]) who were included in the binary model; 439 (28.3%) had RT interruption. There were 1083 patients (69.9%) with available length of RT interruption (continuous model). A binary RT interruption was associated with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.04 (95% CI, 0.90-1.36) for LRF and 1.22 (95% CI, 0.99-1.50) for OS. As a continuous predictor, each 7-day interruption corresponded to HRs of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.12-1.89) for LRF and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.07-1.86) for OS. Analyses did not indicate effect modification by p16 status, and results are presented from models that estimated the effect of RT interruption across both groups. Using covariate-adjusted predictions from models that included clinical and tumor characteristics, a mean 7-day interruption in RT was associated with a 3-year LRF decrement of 4.1% in p16+ OPSCC and 9.1% in LAHNSCC. Predicted 3-year LRF detriment due to RT interruption ranged from 2.0% for a patient with non-T4, non-N3, p16+ OPSCC to 11.2% for a patients with LAHNSCC with a T4N3 p16-negative cancer.
Conclusions And Relevance:
The secondary analysis suggests that RT treatment interruptions may be negatively associated with LRF and OS in HNSCC, but the magnitude of the association varies depending on p16 status and clinical characteristics. While treatment interruptions should globally be discouraged, patients with LAHNSCC or higher-stage disease may be most affected.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00047008; NCT00265941; NCT01302834.
More Related Videos
06:11Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 20, 2018
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...