Response Evaluation Criteria in Grade 1/2 Neuroendocrine Tumors (RECIN)
Piyush Aggarwal1, Swayamjeet Satapathy2, Kunal R Chandekar3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Abstract:
Accurate response assessment in well-differentiated grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remains a major clinical challenge. Conventional size-based radiographic criteria such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 often fail to capture the slow, indolent nature of NETs. In these tumors, meaningful survival benefits, particularly after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, occur without significant tumor shrinkage, while treatment-related necrotic or inflammatory changes can mimic progression. Several modified anatomical criteria, including Choi and mRECIST, have attempted to address these limitations, but results have been inconsistent and largely retrospective. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-labeled analogues offers the opportunity to quantify biological response at the molecular level, reflecting alterations in receptor density and viable tumor burden. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Neuroendocrine Tumors (RECIN), developed from a post-hoc analysis of the phase II LuCAP trial, integrates semi-quantitative SSTR-PET parameters with conventional CT metrics. Using the summed SULpeak of up to five of the hottest lesions (up to two per organ), RECIN defines molecular partial response as a ≥25% reduction in summed SULpeak, while maintaining RECIST safeguards for progression. Applied to the prospective LuCAP trial dataset, RECIN identified additional responders, detected response earlier, and predicted progression-free survival more accurately than RECIST. By harmonizing biological and morphological information, RECIN provides a practical and reproducible framework tailored to the indolent, receptor-driven biology of NETs. Prospective multicenter validation, and correlation with longer term outcomes are needed to establish RECIN as standardized response criteria for PRRT as well as other treatment modalities for well-differentiated NETs.
Insights
Assessing treatment response in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is challenging. The new RECIN criteria, combining PET/CT scans and CT imaging, better evaluate response to therapies like peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) than standard methods.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Assessing treatment response in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is difficult due to their slow-growing nature.
- Conventional criteria like RECIST 1.1 often misinterpret tumor changes, falsely indicating progression.
- Existing modified criteria have shown inconsistent results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate the RECIN criteria for response assessment in NETs.
- To compare RECIN's performance against RECIST 1.1 in the context of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).
Main Methods:
- RECIN was developed using data from the LuCAP trial, integrating SSTR-PET/CT parameters with CT metrics.
- It utilizes the summed SULpeak of the hottest lesions to define molecular response.
- The criteria were applied to the prospective LuCAP trial dataset.
Main Results:
- RECIN identified more responders and detected response earlier compared to RECIST 1.1.
- RECIN demonstrated a more accurate prediction of progression-free survival.
- The criteria harmonize biological and morphological information for NETs.
Conclusions:
- RECIN offers a practical and reproducible framework for response assessment in NETs, tailored to their biology.
- It shows promise in improving response evaluation for PRRT and other treatments.
- Further prospective multicenter validation is required to establish RECIN as a standard criterion.
More Related Videos
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
07:29Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
