Response Evaluation Criteria in Grade 1/2 Neuroendocrine Tumors (RECIN)

Piyush Aggarwal1, Swayamjeet Satapathy2, Kunal R Chandekar3

  • 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

PubMed

Insights

Assessing treatment response in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is challenging. The new RECIN criteria, combining PET/CT scans and CT imaging, better evaluate response to therapies like peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) than standard methods.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Assessing treatment response in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is difficult due to their slow-growing nature.
  • Conventional criteria like RECIST 1.1 often misinterpret tumor changes, falsely indicating progression.
  • Existing modified criteria have shown inconsistent results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the RECIN criteria for response assessment in NETs.
  • To compare RECIN's performance against RECIST 1.1 in the context of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).

Main Methods:

  • RECIN was developed using data from the LuCAP trial, integrating SSTR-PET/CT parameters with CT metrics.
  • It utilizes the summed SULpeak of the hottest lesions to define molecular response.
  • The criteria were applied to the prospective LuCAP trial dataset.

Main Results:

  • RECIN identified more responders and detected response earlier compared to RECIST 1.1.
  • RECIN demonstrated a more accurate prediction of progression-free survival.
  • The criteria harmonize biological and morphological information for NETs.

Conclusions:

  • RECIN offers a practical and reproducible framework for response assessment in NETs, tailored to their biology.
  • It shows promise in improving response evaluation for PRRT and other treatments.
  • Further prospective multicenter validation is required to establish RECIN as a standard criterion.

Related Concept Videos