Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Preliminary Characterization of Proximal Versus Distal Esophageal Function in Healthy, Asymptomatic Adults
Erin L Reedy1,2,3,4,5, Bonnie Martin-Harris4,5,6, Jacob Schauer7
1Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Background:
The reference standard for the assessment of esophageal motility and sphincter function is high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM). Diagnostic values for HRM are determined by the Chicago Classification (CC v4.0), which is based almost entirely on distal esophageal function without measures to address the proximal esophageal segment. Therefore, we sought to determine normal HRM values for proximal esophageal function when obtained in the standard HRM positions (supine and upright).
Methods:
Healthy, asymptomatic adults (≥ 18 years) were recruited. All participants completed a standard protocol. CC v4.0 measurements, along with a proximal contractile integral (PCI) (millimeters mercury-seconds-centimeters[mmHg-s-cm]), temporal measures of proximal and distal contractility (seconds), and lengths of proximal and distal esophagus (centimeters), were performed. Summary statistics, tests of normality, and paired two-sided t-tests were performed.
Results:
HRM data from 30 participants were included. Mean supine PCI was 423.9 mmHg-s-cm with a mean contraction time of 3.2 s and a mean length of 5.5 cm. The mean upright PCI was 183.9 mmHg-s-cm with a mean contraction time of 2.2 s, and a mean length of 4.5 cm. All proximal values were significantly different comparing the two positions (PCI p < 0.0001; time p < 0.0001; length p < 0.0001). All distal measurements fell within the ranges of normal, and all measures for contractile integral, contraction time, and contraction length were statistically significantly different (p < 0.0001 for all) comparing proximal versus distal measurements.
Conclusions:
These preliminary data represent our first attempt to quantify normal proximal esophageal function using HRM measurements of contractile vigor, contraction length, and time.
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophagus
The movement of edibles from the pharynx into the esophagus is facilitated by the upper esophageal sphincter, which is formed primarily by the...

