Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

08:52
3D Ultrasound Imaging: Fast and Cost-effective Morphometry of Musculoskeletal Tissue
Published on: November 27, 2017
23.9K
Multi-method analysis for the three-dimensional reconstruction of muscle fascicles from DiceCT datasets
Aleksandra Ratkiewicz1, Michael C Granatosky1,2,3, Cassidy E Davis4
1Department of Anatomy, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.
Anatomical Record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)
|December 5, 2025
Summary
Contrast-enhanced micro-CT (DiceCT) offers a non-destructive way to measure muscle architecture. Algorithmic fiber tracking with XFiber provides a reliable and efficient method for comparative myological studies.
Area of Science:
- Comparative anatomy
- Biomechanics
- Mammalian evolution
Background:
- Muscle architecture significantly influences muscle performance, feeding ecology, and locomotion in mammals.
- Contrast-enhanced micro-CT (DiceCT) is a non-destructive imaging technique for myological data collection.
- Manual segmentation of DiceCT data is time-consuming and prone to bias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present and validate a standardized protocol for algorithmic muscle fiber tracking using XFiber software.
- To compare the performance of XFiber against manual segmentation, an open-source algorithm (GoodFibes), and traditional dissection methods.
- To assess fascicle length and tortuosity in mammalian jaw muscles across diverse species.
Main Methods:
- A standardized protocol for algorithmic fiber tracking using XFiber (Amira suite) was developed.
- XFber performance was compared to manual segmentation, GoodFibes, and literature dissection values.
- Fascicle length and tortuosity were measured in the jaw muscles of eight mammalian species.
Main Results:
- XFber fascicle lengths closely matched gross dissection and manual segmentation, with a ~15% overestimation common to both digital methods.
- GoodFibes produced substantially longer fascicle lengths compared to other methods.
- XFber and manual segmentation showed similar tortuosity values, while GoodFibes' values were closer to manual segmentation.
Conclusions:
- The XFiber workflow offers a standardized, efficient, and reliable method for analyzing muscle architecture from DiceCT data.
- Algorithmic fiber tracking, particularly with XFiber, presents a promising alternative to manual segmentation for large-scale comparative myological studies.
- This approach minimizes time investment and inter-operator bias, enhancing the reproducibility of muscle architecture research.

