AI-Facilitated Cognitive Reappraisal via Socrates 2.0: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
Philip Held1, Sarah A Pridgen1, Daniel R Szoke1
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1645 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 602, Chicago, IL, 60612, United States.
Background:
Innovative, scalable mental health tools are needed to address systemic provider shortages and accessibility barriers. Large language model-based tools can provide real-time, tailored feedback to help users engage in cognitive reappraisal outside traditional therapy sessions. Socrates 2.0 (Rush University Medical Center) is a multiagent artificial intelligence tool that guides users through Socratic dialogue.
Objective:
The study aimed to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and potential for symptom reduction of Socrates 2.0.
Methods:
A total of 61 adult participants enrolled in a 4-week mixed methods preclinical feasibility study. The participants used Socrates 2.0 as desired and completed the self-report measures of depression, social anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness, along with usability and working alliance, were assessed via validated measures. The semistructured interviews explored user experiences and perceptions.
Results:
Participants engaged with Socrates 2.0 an average of 6.70 (SD 4.57) times over 4 weeks. Feasibility (mean 4.26, SD 0.67), acceptability (mean 4.16, SD 0.84), and usability ratings were high. Participants reported small-to-moderate reductions in depression (effect size d=0.30), social anxiety (d=0.25), obsessive-compulsive (d=0.33), and posttraumatic stress (d=0.28) symptoms. Working alliance scores suggested a moderately strong perceived bond with the artificial intelligence tool. Qualitative feedback indicated that the nonjudgmental, on-demand nature of Socrates 2.0 encouraged self-reflection and exploration. Some users critiqued the repeated questioning style and limited conversation depth.
Conclusions:
Socrates 2.0 was perceived as feasible, acceptable, and moderately helpful for self-guided cognitive reappraisal, demonstrating potential as an adjunct to traditional therapy. Further research, including randomized trials, is needed to determine effectiveness across different populations, optimize personalization, and address the repetitive conversational nature.
More Related Videos
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
08:42Assessment of Social Cognition in Non-human Primates Using a Network of Computerized Automated Learning Device ALDM Test Systems
Published on: May 5, 2015
Related Concept Videos
01:20Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
01:04Social Facilitation
01:17Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion
Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Response
Lazarus proposed that...
01:21Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
02:57The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
01:17Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...