Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
Development of Nontechnical Skills Assessment Tool and The Validation Study for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Zen Naito1, Saseem Poudel2, Keita Ishido1
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
None:
Nontechnical skills, such as situational awareness and decision-making, are essential for safe and efficient surgical performance. Although the Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) framework provides a structured approach, it lacks procedure-specific assessment tools. There remains a significant gap in standardized methods for evaluating and training nontechnical skills in specific surgical procedures.
Objective:
To develop and validate a novel assessment tool, KUDAS-TAPP (Kurashima Decision-making and Situation awareness - Trans Abdominal Preperitoneal approach), specifically designed to evaluate nontechnical skills in the TAPP procedure, focusing on situational awareness and decision-making.
Design And Setting:
Under the supervision of expert hernia surgeons, we developed the KUDAS-TAPP as an assessment tool for nontechnical skills in TAPP. This tool was used to evaluate 3 groups of surgeons: novices, intermediates, and experts. Participants were assessed by 3 independent raters using the KUDAS-TAPP. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and construct validity was examined by comparing scores across experience levels.
Results:
A total of 21 participants (5 novices, 10 intermediates, and 6 experts) from 11 institutions were included. The inter-rater reliability of KUDAS-TAPP was high (ICC = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.84 - 0.96), and internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.97). The median KUDAS-TAPP scores differed significantly across experience levels (p < 0.01), with significant differences between novices and experts, and intermediates and experts (p < 0.01). KUDAS-TAPP scores correlated strongly with the number of TAPP procedures performed (ρ = 0.73, p < 0.01), as well as with Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills for Groin Hernia (GOALS-GH) (ρ = 0.88, p < 0.01) and TAPP checklist scores (ρ = 0.80, p < 0.01).
Conclusion:
The KUDAS-TAPP is a reliable and valid assessment tool for evaluating situational awareness and decision-making in the TAPP procedure. Its application could enhance surgical education and training by providing a structured framework for assessing and improving nontechnical skills. Future research should explore its effectiveness in training programs and adaptability to other surgical procedures.

